“I never did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it
was hell.” ― Harry S. Truman
What a month it has been, a month dripping with hypocrisy
and faux outrage. It’s hard to say which
issue has been the winner, is it the bullshit about Trump failing to condemn
Saudi Arabia’s crown prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) for the murder of Saudi
citizen and Washington Post “journalist” Jamal Khashoggi, or the so-called
special relationship of the US Deep State with the Saudi Government or is it
the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court’s unprecedented attack on the
President of the United States for stating what everyone knows is true, judges
are appointed by Democrats and Republicans specifically for their political
bias.
Judges in America are anything but umpires who call “balls
and strikes,” they are appointed to further the deep state agenda or they
wouldn’t have made it to the highest courts in America. Give me a break Justice Roberts. Judges are appointed specifically for their
party affiliation and their service to the Deep State, after all it was five
corrupt Republican Supreme Court justices who overturned the results of an
American election in 2000 and installed Republican George W. Bush as
president.
Bush immediately kicked off the destruction of America, first
through trillions in tax cuts for the rich while simultaneously starting
endless, trillion dollar wars to wipe out the Clinton billions in surpluses
turning America into a debtor nation. Anyone
remember Prince Bandar bin Sultan - Saudi Arabia's most famous arms dealer,
longtime former ambassador to the US who was affectionately called Bandar Bush
for his close ties to the Bush Crime Family?
It seems that some of the outrage being generated against MBS by the CIA
has something to do with Bandar Bush being arrested by MBS last year for
corruption. From Tyler Durden at ZeroHedge:
Excerpt:
Saudi "Deep State" Prince
Bandar Among Those Arrested In Purge: Report
According to a new report by Middle
East Eye, Prince Bandar bin Sultan - Saudi Arabia's most famous arms dealer, longtime former ambassador to the US, and
recent head of Saudi intelligence - was among those detained as part of Crown
Prince Mohammed bin Salman's (MBS) so-called "corruption purge" that
started with the initial arrests of up to a dozen princes and other top
officials last weekend.
If confirmed, the arrest and
detention of Bandar would constitute the most significant and high profile figure
caught up in the purge - even above that of high profile billionaire investor
Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal - given Bandar's
closeness to multiple US
administrations and involvement in events ranging from Reagan's Nicaraguan
Contra program (including direct involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal), to making the case for the Iraq War as a
trusted friend of Bush and Cheney, to directing US-Saudi covert operations
overseeing the arming of jihadists in Syria.
Middle East Eye issued the report
based on multiple contacts "inside the royal court" and indicates
further that the scale of MBS' aggressive crackdown is much larger than
previously reported, and even involves the torture of "senior
figures" among those detained… And
shockingly, those sources say that the longtime Saudi 'deep state' power broker and liaison with the West, Prince
Bandar, is among the detained:
One of the most famous is Prince
Bandar bin Sultan, a former Saudi ambassador to Washington and confidant of former US President George W
Bush. There is no word on his fate,
but Saudi authorities said that one of the corruption cases they are looking at
is the al-Yamamah arms deal, in which Bandar was involved.
While no doubt Bandar's very
well-known role in Saudi "oil for arms" programs which have come
to define Saudi relations with the West over the past decades is a trumped up
and "selective" charge (insofar as the highest levels of the state
have overseen such shady dealing) the al-Yamamah
deal in particular - which goes back to the mid-1980's - has been an historical embarrassment to
both the UK and Saudi governments (BAE Systems was the prime British
contractor involved) for the astounding level of fraudulent accounting exposed
in UK courts.
Concerning Prince Bandar's role in
the al-Yamamah deal, Middle East Eye continues:
Bandar bought an entire village
in the Cotswolds, a picturesque area of central England, and a 2,000-acre
sporting estate with part of the proceeds from kickbacks he received in the al-Yamamah arms deal,
which netted British manufacturer BAE £43bn ($56.5bn) in contracts for fighter
aircraft.
As much as $30m (£15m) is
alleged to have been paid into Bandar’s
dollar account at Riggs Bank in Washington and the affair led to corruption
probes in the US and UK, although the case was dropped in the UK in 2006
after an intervention by then-prime minister Tony Blair.
But more likely is that Bandar has
been caught up in this week's MBS dragnet for his closeness to Western heads of
state and foreign intelligence services… Likely,
Bandar has been detained to ensure a communications blackout with Western
intelligence and media until MBS' plans are complete, with the added
benefit of ensuring the "anti-corruption" angle to the purges for the
consumption of international media.
Ironically, Bandar himself once seemed to publicly boast about receiving massive
kickbacks in relation to Saudi weapons dealing, which perhaps further made
him an easy and high profile target in this week's crackdown…
Weapons contracts have long been a
source of wealth. British media reported that Prince Bandar received well over $1 billion in secret payments from BAE
Systems, the leading British military contractor, over the course of a decade. The son of founding King Abdulaziz’s
personal doctor, Adnan Khashoggi, became a billionaire as an arms dealer
and go-between for weapons makers and members of the royal family.
Meanwhile news of Bandar's possible
arrest and detention hasn't spread very widely in international media reports
as of this writing, but it will be interesting to see the response in the West
should the news be confirmed. Will
Bandar's friends in Washington and London go to bat for him? Or will Prince
Bandar quietly recede into the background of a permanent forced retirement from
public life?
Most likely the latter will be the
case. Regardless, for friends of the former powerful Saudi intelligence
director on either side of the Atlantic and within Saudi Arabia itself, Bandar no doubt knows where all the
skeletons are buried, and this alone makes him a worrisome, volatile and
unpredictable figure in the midst of a transfer of power.
Hmm, interesting Jamal Khashoggi was a cousin to Bandar and
was a reporter for the Washington Post, the CIA’s propaganda arm. It was Bandar along with Tony Blair and W. Bush
that sold the Iraq war to the people based on their lies and all three have
gotten richer off the war. Very
interesting don’t you think? Bandar Bush
was identified in the secret 28 pages of the 911 report. From Veterans Today:
Excerpt:
Bandar “Bush” Named as 9/11 Planner in 28 Pages
Editor’s note: Prince Bandar, former head of
Saudi secret services, former Ambassador to the United States, has been tied directly to the planning of
9/11. Below, an excerpt in
the widely censored release of the 28 long withheld pages, made a huge error.
In naming ASPCOL Corporation as
handling the “property” of Prince Bandar, those who failed to redact this
section did not note that attorney William Jordan III, the sole proprietor of ASPCOL Corporation, not only represents
Bandar’s property interests but has
broader involvements in arms sales and more, as outlined in the February
12, 2008 Aspen Daily News article included as Appendix I.
Seemingly, film maker Michael Moore
had this right in Fahrenheit 9/11…
The declassified documents were
released by Congress on Friday and released them the same day, release of the documents confirmed suspicions that the
terrorists involved in the 9/11 attacks – most of whom were Saudi nationals
– likely
received support from high-ranking Saudi intelligence officers.
“While in the United States, some
of the September 11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support or assistance from, individuals who may have be
connected to the Saudi Government,” the report states. “There is
information, primarily from FBI sources, that at least two of those individuals were alleged by some to be Saudi
intelligence officers.”
My, my, my thick as thieves.
Now America’s “intelligence agencies” are claiming the MBS ordered the
hit on Khashoggi but can we believe anything that comes from these corrupt
agencies? President Trump is not caving
to pressure to oust MBS, so I wonder what Trump knows, maybe the answer is in
this article from State of the Nation:
Excerpt:
Here’s why Khashoggi was really killed and set up with a Turkish
honeytrap
Jamal Khashoggi and Hatice Cengiz
Who is Hatice Cengiz?
Primary Reasons Why MbS Ordered
Assassination:
(i) Khashoggi Developing Exposé on
Use of Chemical Weapons in Yemen by Saudi Arabia
(ii) Khashoggi’s Integral
Participation in Upcoming Coup Against the Saudi Crown Prince
(iii) Khashoggi contracted by
Brennan’s rogue C.I.A. to blow up relationship between Trump and MbS.
It’s very important to note that no other assassination in recent history
has received so much mainstream media (MSM) attention as the macabre killing of
Jamal Khashoggi. One would think
that he was the JFK of Saudi Arabia from the nonstop, above-the-fold print
reporting, especially from the American MSM.
There are very good reasons for
this. The entire assassination conspiracy was stealthily crafted by John
Brennan’s rogue C.I.A. Just like
former CIA Director Allen Dulles literally commandeered the assassination plot
of JFK in 1963 after he was fired by President Kennedy, it appears that Brennan
oversaw this scheme to take out Khashoggi in the most crafty and dramatic way.
The Washington Post is a key cog in the CIA’s Mockingbird Media
and, therefore, all of their reporters
are either card-carrying CIA agents or covert contractors. There’s no question that Khashoggi’s
loyalties shifted majorly after he began writing for the WaPo in September of
2017. That month marked the beginning of
the end of Khashoggi.
The ongoing war between President
Trump and the WaPo’s owner Jeff Bezos is well documented. Bezos
has always been a prime CIA asset (that’s why he was chosen to build and head
Amazon.com) and he was recruited to purchase The Washington Post by his
handlers. The top spooks at Langley knew
they could count on him to weaponize the premier newspaper of record whenever
ordered to. And so he has—BIG TIME!
With this critical understanding,
it’s very easy to see how Khashoggi was
used by the rogue C.I.A. to drive a massive wedge between Trump and Saudi Crown
Prince Mohammad Bin Salman Al Saud. MbS, as he is known, was an extremely
vulnerable target for a WaPo investigative journalist, particularly one like
Khashoggi who was a lifelong insider within the House of Saud.
Because Khashoggi was employed by the opposing Saudi factions at different
times of his career, he was privy to everything—all the state secrets…and there
are many. As follows:
• Khashoggi was closely associated
with “Prince Turki who was the director of the Mukhabarat, the Saudi state
intelligence apparatus”. It’s quite likely that whatever Prince
Turki knew about the false flag terrorist attacks of 9/11 where it
concerned the direct involvement of Saudi Arabia, so did Khashoggi. TPTB could simply no longer trust him with
that highly radioactive 9/11 information.
Ten days before the 9/11 terror attacks on New York City, in which some
3,000 Americans died, Prince Turki retired from his post as head of Saudi
intelligence. It was an abrupt departure, well before his tenure was due to
expire.
What does Turkey and the apparent honeypot have to do with all of this.
President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was
determined to pose a countervailing force to the Saudi juggernaut that started
rolling across the Middle East with the blessing of their
partner-in-war-crimes—Israel. This highly aggressive military posture is
unprecedented and was assumed by Saudi Arabia with the ascension of MsB and
the forming of his close partnership with the Trump administration.
Erdoğan knew that he had to do
something very radical or else his grandiose plans to form a 3rd Millennium
Ottoman Caliphate would be doomed. Hence, the evidence demonstrates that
honeypot Hatice Cengiz was sent into Jamal’s life to entrap him in a scheme
that would seal his fate, which it did.
The whole story about “Khashoggi
collecting divorce papers relating to his previous marriage” never made any
sense. Why Khashoggi would ever enter
the Saudi consulate in Ankara is even a greater mystery, especially in light of his
exceedingly dangerous position as potentially the greatest whistleblower OF ALL
TIME (e.g. 9/11 truth)…
That the entire conversation was
recorded after Khashoggi entered the consulate is also quite suspect. That’s because the entire assassination plot
was implemented according to a carefully constructed plan. The
only one who didn’t know about it was Khashoggi. Even Trump knew about the murder plot as
Khashoggi was the most monitored man in the USA…in Turkey…and anywhere else he
traveled to.
But why would President Trump
permit a rogue CIA faction to pull off such a dastardly deed in broad daylight,
especially one that would completely tear apart the US-Saudi relationship? Trump is more concerned about the price of
oil in 2018 and beyond than anything else on Earth. His
main promise and purpose is to MAGA, and he cannot do that with a skyrocketing
or wildly fluctuating oil price.
Hence, this whole scheme could also be used by his administration to
keep MsS on a very short leash. Which it
has done…
This high-profile assassination also allowed Turkey to re-assert itself
onto the Mideast geopolitical chessboard in a HUGE way. Turkey believes that the heinous
assassination can forever be used as a cudgel to beat Saudi Arabia whenever it
oversteps as it’s doing everyday under the tyrannical MbS…
Now that the C.I.A. has issued a report boldly incriminating MbS,
anything goes. This thing can
explode into a clusterf*ck of incriminations and recrimination by all the
concerned parties…and there are many.
Just sit back and watch the fireworks, as it’s going to get very
interesting indeed. TMR’s next report
will cover the inevitable cataclysmic damage in the wake of this geopolitical
superstorm. It may also prove to be a
perfect storm where it concerns the desperately needed revelation of 9/11 truth…
The real trifecta of treachery is the three B’s, Bush,
Bandar and Blair unindicted war criminals.
It sounds like the election of Donald Trump was a HUGE reset on the
world stage. Trump’s relationship with MBS
is going to be real interesting, especially because Trump doesn’t blindly trust
the CIA or the Washington Post. As is always
with the case with war it’s all about the big banks and big oil. From Mint Press:
Excerpt:
The Real Reason the Knives are Out for MBS
In the six weeks before Khashoggi’s
disappearance, MBS not only managed to
anger the U.S. military-industrial complex but the world’s most powerful
bankers. Thus, it seems that it was
the privatization of Aramco that had MBS spooked.
Far beyond the cancellation of the
IPO itself — MBS has endangered other
parts of the plan that these powerful financial interests had been counting on
for well over a year. That includes Vision 2030’s plan to increase the
Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) — which is managed by a group of HSBC and Bank of America directors and a
CitiGroup investment banking alumnus — from its current $230 billion in assets to a massive $2 trillion.
The dramatic increase in the fund’s
size would make the PIF the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world. Without
that injection of cash into the PIF from the Aramco IPO, media reports have warned of a “ripple effect” on the U.S. economy,
including massive U.S. tech companies like Uber, given that the PIF has
invested heavily in such companies.
Evidence has since emerged that MBS
knows that these powerful banks are still angry despite his efforts to placate
them. On October 5, just a few days after Khashoggi’s murder, MBS promised a new Aramco IPO within a few
years, this time valued at $2 trillion. However, media reports on that
announcement made it clear that Goldman Sachs, CitiGroup and the like weren’t convinced.
Indeed, with the entire privatization effort now in doubt, so too is
the estimated $6 trillion in direct investments from powerful interests
that had been planned to fund the privatization schemes that comprise the
entirety of Vision 2030. That figure could certainly explain why so much
pressure has been levied against MBS as of late over Khashoggi.
Indeed, given that the Saudis had
butchered another dissident writer in 1979 in their Lebanese consulate without
the same outrage that has resulted from Khashoggi’s murder, it is safe to say
that the establishment’s outrage over
this latest extrajudicial killing is motivated less by “human rights” than
by trillions of dollars of capital.
A 2016 report from Foreign Policy
succinctly states why past Saudi Royals
have avoided “free-market reforms” as the older generations of the House of
Saud “understand the fragility of a monarchy whose brittle pillars rest on the
quiescence of conservative clerics and a merchant class hostile to the
free-market reforms that will undercut their privileges.”
However, far more Saudis than just the
“merchant class” have grown accustomed to the largesse of the Saudi state, as the majority of Saudi citizens benefit
from Saudi state spending in the form of fuel subsidies, loans, free land, and
public-sector jobs, among other boons.
Indeed, half of the entire Saudi population is currently on welfare —
welfare that depends on the wealth of the Saudi state and its oil revenue — while two-thirds of Saudis work in the
public sector.
Of course, sharing oil profits
with robber barons — as would have been the case in the partial privatization
of Saudi Aramco — would reduce the amount of money the Saudi government
dedicates annually to welfare programs and public-sector jobs to a significant
degree. Notably, Vision 2030 also
included “austerity programs” as part of its implementation, including tax
increases and a significant reduction in the fuel subsidies given to ordinary
Saudis.
However, less than a week after a handful of those austerity measures
were implemented earlier this year, the Saudi
government quickly eased them by increasing state-job salaries and launching a
new economic stimulus program, after a “very negative” public response.
Despite the government’s efforts to
assuage the anger that austerity had caused, it was not enough and the outcry
continued, forcing the Saudi government to fire the country’s water minister to
absorb some of the outrage. The fierce
public response seems to have given MBS his first real inkling that his
“ambitious reforms” to privatize Saudi Arabia would not be so easy to
implement, no matter how hard he had worked to crush dissent.
Another indication of why MBS backed out of privatization plans can
be seen in what happened to other countries when their young princes,
championed as “ambitious reformers,” had drunk the “McKinsey Kool-Aid.” As
Salem Saif wrote at Jacobin, many of the Arab countries that had previously
followed McKinsey-drafted plans for neoliberalization subsequently “became
epicenters of the Arab Spring. Bahrain,
Egypt, Libya, Yemen — each was convulsed by demonstrations, often animated
by economic grievances.”
In contrast, Saudi Arabia, with its state-owned and state-managed
assets, had remained largely immune to these economically-spurred uprisings
throughout the Middle East.
However, earlier this year, MBS learned the hard way from the hostile
reception to his privatization rollout that being the West’s neoliberal
darling comes at a high price, one that could imperil not just his
position as Crown Prince but the entire Saudi government.
The search begins for a new
prince who will play along
As a consequence of the Khashoggi
incident, there have been several reports from prominent publications claiming
that efforts are now underway to replace MBS as crown prince. One such report
in France’s Le Figaro has stated that MBS
is set to be “gradually” replaced by his even younger brother Khalid bin
Salman, who has most recently served as the Saudi Ambassador to Washington.
This choice is significant, as it
shows that the powers-that-be are
seeking to replace MBS with another McKinsey-bent “young Arab princeling”
instead of the former Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef or another elder of the
House of Saud who would oppose the privatization that MBS had promised but
failed to deliver…
Beyond his stated views in support of current Saudi policy, including the
genocidal war the Saudis are waging in Yemen, not much else is known
about Khalid, who has little political experience given his young age and his
time spent as a fighter pilot in the Royal Saudi Air Force.
Yet, in his capacity as Saudi ambassador, Khalid bin Salman has met with
powerful Congressmen from both parties, as well as Lockheed Martin
executives, cultivating personal ties in the process…
Yet, what is clear is that MBS’ rise to power was backed by the
international elite and the Trump administration based on the promise of
these neoliberal reforms and the mass
sale of U.S. weapons to Saudi Arabia.
So Washington is threatening to oust MBS and install a
puppet to enforce neoliberal policies like they have in Greece, you know
austerity programs. HSBC and the greedy big
banks want their snouts in the Saudi trough.
They want the Saudi people to suffer like the people are suffering in
America and in Britain. Well Philip
Giraldi at Lew Rockwell has the right idea:
Excerpt:
The Only Regime Change that Is Needed Is in Washington
Ambassador James Jeffrey Nut of the
Month
One of the things to look forward
to in the upcoming holiday season is the special treats that one is allowed to
sample. Fruitcake and nuts are Thanksgiving and Christmas favorites. They
usually come in tins or special packages but it seems that this season some of the nuts have escaped and have fled to obtain
sanctuary from the Trump Administration.
Currently, there is certainly a
wide range of nuts available on display in the West Wing. There is the delicate
but hairy Bolton, which has recently received the coveted “Defender of Israel”
award, and also the robust Pompeo,
courageously bucking the trend to overeat during the holidays by telling the
Iranian people that they should either surrender or starve to death. And
then there is the always popular Haley, voting audaciously to give part of
Syria to Israel as a holiday treat.
But my vote for the most magnificent nut in an Administration that is
overflowing with such talent would be the esteemed United States Special
Representative for Syria Engagement James Jeffrey.
The accolade is in part due to the
fact that Jeffrey started out relatively sane as a career diplomat with the
State Department, holding ambassadorships in Iraq, Turkey, and Albania. He had to work hard to become as
demented as he now is but was helped along the way by signing on as a
visiting fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), which
is a spin-off of the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
Jeffrey set the tone for his term
of office shortly after being appointed back in August when he argued that
the Syrian terrorists were “. . . not terrorists, but people fighting a civil
war against a brutal dictator.”
Jeffrey, who must have somehow missed a lot of the head chopping and rape going
on, subsequently traveled to the Middle East and stopped off in Israel to meet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It has
been suggested that Jeffrey received his marching orders during the visit.
James Jeffrey has been particularly
active during this past month. On November 7th he declared that he would
like to see Russia maintain a “permissive approach” to allowing the Israelis to
attack Iranian targets inside Syria.
Regarding Iran’s possible future role in Syria, he observed that
“Iranians are part of the problem not part of the solution…”
As virtually no one but Jeffrey and the Israeli government actually
believes that Damascus and Tehran were responsible for creating ISIS, the
ambassador elaborated, blaming President Bashar al-Assad for the cycle of
violence in Syria that, he claimed, allowed the development of the terrorist
group in both Syria and neighboring Iraq…
Jeffrey’s formula is just another recycling of the myth that the Syrian
opposition consisted of good folks who wanted to establish democracy in the
country. In reality, it incorporated terrorist elements right from the
beginning and groups like ISIS and the al-Qaeda affiliates rapidly assumed
control of the violence. That Jeffrey should be so ignorant or blinded by his
own presumptions to be unaware of that is astonishing.
It is also interesting to note that he makes no mention of the U.S.
invasion of Iraq, knee-jerk support for Israel and the unrelenting pressure
on Syria starting with the Syrian Accountability Act of 2003 and continuing
with the embrace of the so-called Arab Spring. Most observers believe that
those actions were major contributors to the rise of ISIS.
Jeffrey’s unflinching embrace of
the Israeli and hardline Washington assessment of the Syrian crisis comes as no
surprise given his pedigree, but in the same interview where he pounded Iran
and Syria, he asserted oddly that “We’re
not about regime change. We’re about a change in the behavior of a government
and of a state.”
Actually, the only regime change
that is needed is in Washington and it would include Jeffrey, Bolton, Haley,
Pompeo, and Miller. And while we’re at it, get rid of son-in-law Jared Kushner
and his claque of Orthodox Jews, Jason Greenblatt the “peace negotiator” and
David Friedman the U.S. Ambassador in Israel. None of them are capable of acting to advance any American national
interest, which they wouldn’t recognize even if it hit them in the butt…
Regime change in America cannot come too soon how this cabal
managed to take over the Trump Administration is a mystery. The mess they made in Ukraine is now reaching
a melting point with the corrupt American installed, Petro Poroshenko trying to
start a war with Russia. From RT:
Excerpt:
US, Europe & NATO risk all-out war by backing unhinged Kiev regime
Arguably, the Kiev regime and its adulation of World War II Nazi
collaborators never had any legitimacy in the first place. It continues to
demonstrate its lack of legitimacy from the immense social problems in
Ukraine of poverty, corruption, human rights violations, neo-Nazi
paramilitaries running amok, and now martial law being imposed.
It remains to be seen if the recent
naval provocation was carried out with the tacit approval of Washington and
other NATO powers as a pretext for further militarization against Russia. The
initial misplaced condemnations of Russia have subsided to more measured calls from US President Donald Trump and French Foreign
Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian for “restraint” and “dialogue.”
That might suggest Kiev’s failing
President Poroshenko and his security services acted alone to order the naval
confrontation as a desperate throw of
the dice to escalate NATO and EU support for his shaky regime against Russia.
Trump’s comments hoping that Kiev and Russia would “straighten things
out” sound like Washington is not behind the provocation and has no desire
for a wider conflict. Just as well, because such a development is a gateway to
all-out war.
Nevertheless, such a catastrophe is
always a serious risk when Western
powers indulge this unhinged Kiev regime.
Amen, just another US installed unhinged regime. None of this would have happened were it not
for the decision by five corrupt Supreme Court Justices overturning the
American election results in 2000 and installing George W. Bush as president. So Justice Roberts, your claims are pure
horseshit.
“We do
not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” “What we
have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do
equal right to those appearing
before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful
for.”
Were Bush not installed in 2000 by five corrupt judges you
would not be on that corrupt court. If Al
Gore were allowed to take office after the American people voted him in as
president in 2000 there would have been no 911 attack. The Gore Commission had released a report after
two years of study while he was Vice President identifying terrorism as America’s
biggest threat, particularly the threat of an airliner being hijacked and used
as a bomb. Gore had a list of
recommendations one being securing the cockpit doors,
The Republicans in congress laughed at Gore and refused to
fund the Gore recommendations to protect America from the exact kind of attack
that took place 9 months after Bush took office. Bush and Cheney tore up the Gore Commission
report saying the biggest threat to America was Saddam Hussein.
So call him Mr. Obvious, as the corrupt media clamors for Trump
to condemn MBS, and screams that Putin is attacking Ukraine, and calls for
regime change in Syria, Trump tells truth. The more Trump tell the truth the louder the
media screams. When Harry Truman was on
the campaign trail and someone yelled “Give them hell Harry” them being
Republicans. Truman’s reply was “I never
did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell.” So give them hell Trump, keep telling the
truth.
