Stolen elections have
deadly consequences
“Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide
everything.” ― Joseph Stalin
It’s a frightening thing to consider, but the ultimate success of
democracy in the United States largely hinges on the integrity of just three
voting machine companies, which conduct their affairs with almost no government
oversight and regulation. Unless that changes, the greatest democracy will
start looking like a banana republic in the eyes of the world. ~ Robert
Bridge
American elections have devolved into a cesspool of election
fraud perpetrated by both parties to thwart the will of the American people and
promote an agenda that benefits foreign powers and banks while financially and
physically decimating the America. America’s 2020 election was a fascist
coup. In Venezuela when the CIA was
unable oust President Maduro they just declared the Venezuela’s election illegitimate
and named CIA stooge, Juan Guido President.
Joe Biden is America’s Juan Guido, a useful idiot.
In 1944 Henry Wallace, who was Vice President under FDR
until he was forcibly removed from the ticket by the Democratic Establishment for
the crime of wanting better relations with Russia and China, warned of the
danger posed by American fascists. From Truthout:
Excerpt:
The Dangers of American Fascism
A fascist is one whose lust for money or power is combined with such an
intensity of intolerance toward those of other races, parties, classes,
religions, cultures, regions or nations as to make him ruthless in his use of deceit or violence to attain his ends…
The dangerous American fascist is
the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did
in Germany in a Prussian way. The
American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the
channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but
how best to use the news to deceive the
public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power…
Most American fascists are enthusiastically supporting the war effort.
They are doing this even in those cases where they hope to have profitable
connections with German chemical firms after the war ends. They are patriotic in time of
war because it is to their interest to be so, but in time of peace they follow
power and the dollar wherever they may lead.
AMERICAN FASCISM WILL NOT BE REALLY DANGEROUS UNTIL THERE IS A PURPOSEFUL COALITION AMONG THE
CARTELISTS, THE DELIBERATE POISONERS OF PUBLIC INFORMATION…
Still another danger is represented by those who, paying lip service to
democracy and the common welfare, in
their insatiable greed for money and the power which money gives, do not
hesitate surreptitiously to evade the laws designed to safeguard the public
from monopolistic extortion.
The symptoms of fascist thinking
are colored by environment and adapted to immediate circumstances. But always and everywhere they can be identified by their appeal to
prejudice and by the desire to play upon the fears and vanities of different
groups in order to gain power. It
is no coincidence that the growth of modern tyrants has in every case been
heralded by the growth of prejudice…
The American fascists are most
easily recognized by their deliberate perversion of truth and fact. Their
newspapers and propaganda carefully cultivate every fissure of disunity, every
crack in the common front against fascism. They use every
opportunity to impugn democracy. They use isolationism as a slogan to
conceal their own selfish imperialism.
They claim to be super-patriots,
but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the
spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward
which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using
the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, THEY MAY
KEEP THE COMMON MAN IN ETERNAL SUBJECTION…
Monopolists who fear
competition and who distrust democracy because it stands for
equal opportunity would like to secure their position against small and
energetic enterprise. In an effort to eliminate the possibility of any
rival growing up, some monopolists would sacrifice democracy itself.
It has been claimed at times that
our modern age of technology facilitates dictatorship. What we must understand is that the industries, processes, and
inventions created by modern science can be used either to subjugate or liberate.
The choice is up to us…
FASCISM IN THE POSTWAR
INEVITABLY WILL PUSH STEADILY FOR ANGLO-SAXON IMPERIALISM AND EVENTUALLY FOR
WAR WITH RUSSIA. Already American fascists are talking and writing
about this conflict and using it as an excuse for their internal hatreds and
intolerances toward certain races, creeds and classes…
It is an infectious disease, and we
must all be on our guard against intolerance, bigotry and the pretension of
invidious distinction. But if we put our
trust in the common sense of common men and “with malice toward none and
charity for all” go forward on the great adventure of making political,
economic and social democracy a practical reality, we shall not fail.
Man if that doesn’t describe America in 2020 I don’t know
what does. Fascism is alive and well in
the halls of congress. Henry Wallace
wrote “The Dangers of American Fascism” in 1944. In 1996 a group of radical dual citizenship Zionists
wrote a manifesto for Benjamin Netanyahu calling for an imperialist agenda that
would financially “devastate” America and promote a greater Israel.
According to the Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing
the Realm “
Israel
has the opportunity to make a clean break; it can forge a peace process and
strategy based on an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room
to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism, the starting
point of which must be economic reform.”
The individuals who were behind the Clean Break Strategy
chose George W. Bush, the son of an ex-CIA Director and ex-President with deep
ties to the Israeli lobby and defense and intelligence industry in America to
be their president. Bush would usher in
this New World Order that would use America’s treasury to fund these wars while
cutting taxes and slashing domestic programs.
In spite of massive election fraud in Florida where Bush’s
Brother Jeb was Governor, Bush still lost the election to Al Gore. That was when the real chicanery took
place. From Patrick Martin at WorldSocialist Website:
Excerpt:
Ten years since Bush v. Gore:
The stolen election of 2000
Sunday, December 12 marks ten years
since the US Supreme Court effectively decided the outcome of the 2000
presidential election, halting the counting of votes in Florida and awarding
the White House to George W. Bush. The
5-4 ruling in Bush v. Gore, together with the contemptible
capitulation of the Democratic Party, constituted a milestone in the decay
of American democracy.
In a social and political context
in which the debacles produced by the Bush administration loom so large in
everyday life, it might be thought
that the American media and political opinion makers would devote considerable
attention to the tenth anniversary of the event that placed Bush in the White
House.
In fact, however, the silence is deafening… The silence of the
nominally “liberal” press is a guilty one. They
do not wish to revisit the history, not so long ago, in which the Democratic
Party and the liberal media surrendered to a right-wing judicial coup d’état, whose effect was to install the most
right-wing government in American history.
The election of November 7, 2000
The events of Election Day 2000,
encompassing the night of Tuesday, November 7 and the early morning hours of
Wednesday, November 8, are among the most extraordinary in American political
history. Yet they came after a presidential campaign of the most humdrum
character, in which no political issues were seriously discussed. The
consensus among political pundits and pollsters was that Bush, then
governor of Texas, held a narrow but significant lead over his Democratic
opponent, Vice President Al Gore.
As in 1998, however, when predictions of major Republican gains in the
midst of the impeachment crisis failed to materialize, it appeared as the
votes began to be counted that the political establishment had
underestimated the popular hostility towards the right-wing program of the
Republican Party, founded on tax cuts for the wealthy and the slashing of domestic
social spending.
Gore won many of the big industrial
states with relative ease, including Michigan and Pennsylvania. The Democrats
were sweeping the northeastern states and were expected to win the Pacific
Coast, while Bush carried the south and southwest, the Rocky Mountain states
and Ohio. It appeared that the election would be decided by Florida’s 25 votes
in the Electoral College.
Just before 8 p.m., several US
television networks called the outcome in Florida for Gore, based on their exit
polls of voters compiled throughout the day. The Bush campaign reacted
immediately, breaking with precedent and putting the candidate before television cameras to denounce the network
projections and declare his certainty that Florida—where his brother Jeb was
governor and the Republicans controlled the machinery of state government—would
end up in his column.
The networks backed down,
rescinding their call for Gore and declaring the outcome in Florida still
undecided. Then, in the early hours of Wednesday, Fox News became the first network to call Florida for Bush, thereby
declaring him the victor in the election.
Heading the decision desk, where the network reviewed vote totals and
polls to arrive at projections, was John W. Ellis, a first cousin of George W. Bush.
Ellis unilaterally called the election for Bush before any determination
by the Voter News Service, the consortium of leading newspapers and television
networks, after a 2 a.m. telephone discussion with Bush and his brother Jeb.
When the other networks
followed suit, pronouncing Bush the winner, Democrat Al Gore
telephoned his concession to Bush. But on the way to make his televised
concession speech before an audience of supporters in Nashville, Gore received
a phone call from campaign aides who advised him that the numbers in Florida
showed the race too close to call. Gore telephoned Bush again and retracted his
concession.
These events had critical
importance for what was to follow. The
media coverage, as well as Gore’s premature concession, gave the impression to the public that Bush
had “won” Florida—and the national election—by a narrow margin. Throughout
the ensuing crisis, the corporate-controlled media largely parroted the
official Republican posture that Bush was the presumptive winner. The
fact that Gore had won by a sizeable margin in the national popular vote, as
much as a half million votes, was dismissed as of no significance.
The struggle in Florida
Gore retracted his concession phone
call to Bush because of reports flowing
in to his campaign about numerous and widespread irregularities in the Florida
voting, including measures to suppress the Democratic vote by arbitrarily
barring black voters. It emerged that in a single county, Palm Beach, some
19,000 votes cast for president were invalidated because the voters, confused
by the layout of the ballot paper, had chosen more than one candidate.
Thousands more in Palm Beach, in heavily Jewish precincts, had inadvertently
cast ballots for the ultra-right independent candidate Patrick
Buchanan.
In Miami-Dade, there were numerous reports of ballots being distributed
in Haitian immigrant precincts that were pre-punched for Bush. In Duval
County, which includes the city of Jacksonville, nearly half the “spoiled”
ballots came in four of the county’s 14 districts—those which were largely
black and had gone heavily for Gore. In
some black precincts the rate of supposed spoilage rose to 31 percent.
The first recount of voting machines, required by Florida law, cut
Bush’s supposed margin from 1,725 to 327 votes, but there were tens of
thousands of ballots still uncounted, concentrated in four major metropolitan
counties—Miami-Dade, Broward, Volusia and Palm Beach—where there was a
substantial Democratic majority. Local officials began hand recounts in each of
these areas.
The Republican-controlled state government stepped in to block this
vote counting. Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, co-chairman of
the Bush campaign in Florida and a Bush elector, first ordered the counting
stopped. When reversed in court, she said she would not extend the November 14
deadline for reporting final totals, even though her own actions, in initially
halting the count, made it impossible for three of the four counties to finish
their recounts in time.
This arrogant opposition to demands
that all votes be counted typified the stand of the Bush camp from the
beginning. It was combined with
misinformation and lies. The chief of the Bush recount team,
former secretary of state James Baker, declared that machine counts were more
reliable than hand counts, although hand counts are accepted as the
highest standard in most states, and Bush had signed a Texas state law to that
effect.
Bush spokesmen continually declared
that the votes in Florida had been counted multiple times, each time showing
the Republican the winner, although
there were tens of thousands of ballots that were never counted at any time.
The purpose of such lies was to cover up the basic fact that a Bush election
victory required the suppression of votes cast in Florida.
The response of the Democratic
Party and the Gore campaign to this procedural coup d’état was belated and
halfhearted. The Gore campaign went to court against Harris’s decision, but
sought a recount only in the four large metropolitan counties rather than
statewide. In contrast to the ferocious
partisanship and aggressiveness of the Bush campaign, Gore put his Florida
recount effort under the direction of former secretary of state Warren
Christopher, a corporate lawyer who was hostile to a court fight and rejected making any appeal to the
democratic sentiments of the American population.
The issue of the right to vote
On Friday, November 17 the issue came to a head when a local judge
in Tallahassee, Florida ordered a halt to all vote recounts, only to be
overturned hours later by the Florida state Supreme Court, which barred
Harris from declaring Bush the winner of the state’s electoral votes and
reinstated the vote counting in Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach counties,
although for a limited period.
Four days later, the court issued a
decision compelling state officials to accept and certify the hand recounts,
based on the right of Florida citizens to vote and to have their votes counted.
Citing the Florida state constitution,
the seven justices wrote, “The right of suffrage is the preeminent right
contained in the Declaration of Rights, for without this basic freedom all
others would be diminished.”
The purpose of election laws was not to arbitrarily exclude voters
who failed some technical requirement, but to
“facilitate and safeguard the right of each voter to express his or her will in
the context of our representative democracy.”
The Bush campaign responded with a vitriolic denunciation of the court,
a legal appeal to the US Supreme Court, and frenzied efforts to counter the
state court’s decision by any means necessary, including violence.
There were calls for the Republican-controlled state legislature to
intervene with legislation that would award Florida’s 25 electoral votes to
Bush, regardless of the will of the voters. Florida state legislators began
preparations for such action, using as a pretext the December 12 deadline for
states to submit the list of electors to Washington. In the US capital, leaders of the Republican-controlled Congress
suggested they would refuse to accept Democratic electors from Florida when the
electoral votes were officially tabulated in January…
The Supreme Court steps in
A federal appeals court, with a top-heavy majority of Republican
appointees, refused to take jurisdiction over the Florida recount, as demanded
by the Bush campaign, citing the right of the Florida state Supreme Court
to interpret and make final rulings on state law. The Bush campaign appealed to
the US Supreme Court, which scheduled a hearing on Friday, December 1.
The three most right-wing justices,
Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Clarence
Thomas, took the lead in the hearing, suggesting that the Florida state Supreme Court, by elevating the right to vote as the
highest principle, was violating Article II of the US Constitution, which
delegates to state legislatures the decision on how to choose electors. There was no constitutional right to vote
for president, Scalia said…
On Monday, December 4 the US Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling
remanding the case back to the Florida Supreme Court, with instructions
that the Florida justices clarify the grounds on which they had overruled the
Republican state authorities. The
opinion of the unanimous ruling included the Article II argument made by
Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas.
The Florida Supreme Court revisited
the arguments made by the Bush and Gore campaigns, as well as lower court
rulings against the recounts in various counties. On Friday, December 8 it ordered a recount of all “undervotes” (ballots
where punch card readers failed to detect the vote) in all Florida counties, so that in all cases where the voter’s
intention could be determined by evidence, the vote would be counted.
The majority affirmed basic principles
of popular sovereignty: “This essential
principle, that the outcome of elections be determined by the will of the
voters, forms the foundation of the election code enacted by the Florida
Legislature and has been consistently applied by this Court in solving election
disputes,” the majority wrote. “We are
dealing with the essence of the structure of our democratic society.”
The Bush campaign immediately
appealed this decision to the US Supreme Court, and a day later, as election
officials throughout Florida were beginning the recount, the Supreme Court
issued an emergency order to stop. The
5-4 ruling found that “irreparable harm” would be done to the petitioner,
George W. Bush—I.E., HE WOULD BE DEPRIVED OF THE PRESIDENCY BY A VALID COUNT OF
THE VOTES.
While the four-member liberal
minority argued that the federal courts had traditionally deferred to state
courts in the interpretation of state constitutions and state election laws,
the five-member majority discarded their usual posture of support for “states’
rights” when it came into conflict with the interests of the Republican Party
and its ultra-right backers.
Three days later, the same 5-4 majority handed down its final ruling,
declaring, in a perfect Catch-22, that the delay in the recount—caused by its
own order—had made it impossible to complete a recount in time to meet the
December 12 deadline for certifying electors. Accordingly, the decision of the Republican-controlled state
government, awarding the electors to Bush, was upheld.
Because the three ultra-right members could not obtain agreement from
two other conservatives, Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy, to base the decision on Scalia’s Article
II claim that the American people have no constitutional right to vote for
president, THE COURT MAJORITY FOUND AN ENTIRELY NEW LEGAL ARGUMENT TO
SUPPORT ITS PREDETERMINED OUTCOME: PUTTING BUSH IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
They ruled that the Florida Supreme
Court’s decision that election officials in the 64 counties should set the
standards for determining voter intent was a violation of the Fourteenth
Amendment’s requirement of “equal protection of the law.” With unparalleled cynicism, Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas, invariably
hostile to “equal protection” arguments when made by plaintiffs who were black,
Hispanic, female, poor or otherwise politically disadvantaged, embraced the argument on behalf of the
millionaire son of a former president.
Justice John Paul Stevens, in his
dissent for the minority, wrote: “Although we may never know with complete certainty
the identity of the winner of this year’s presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly
clear. It is the nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of
the rule of law.”
The capitulation of the Democrats
The submission of the Gore campaign to the transparently biased and
antidemocratic Supreme Court majority was evident at the hearing held on
December 11, the day before the final ruling was issued. Gore’s lead
attorney, David Boies, made no mention of the frontal assault on democratic
rights embodied in the position of Scalia and sought to appeal to the two
“swing” justices, O’Connor and Kennedy, with legalistic quibbling.
Public spokesmen for the Gore
campaign and the Democratic Party repeatedly declared their full confidence in
the impartiality and fairness of the high court and their determination to
abide by whatever result was handed down. When
the ruling was issued, Gore went on national television to publicly declare his
capitulation and embrace the presidency of George W. Bush as legitimate.
This capitulation was foreshadowed
by the entire conduct of the Gore campaign, even before the Florida crisis. Gore selected as his running mate Senator
Joseph Lieberman, perhaps the most right-wing Senate Democrat, largely because
of his early public denunciation of President Bill Clinton during the Monica
Lewinsky sex scandal.
THROUGHOUT THE FLORIDA CRISIS, LIEBERMAN ACTED AS A VIRTUAL
REPUBLICAN ASSET, OPPOSING ANY SERIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE EFFORTS TO SUPPRESS
VOTE COUNTING AND HIJACK THE ELECTION, AND MAKING PUBLIC STATEMENTS THAT
FREQUENTLY ECHOED THE ARGUMENTS FROM THE BUSH CAMP…
Throughout this crisis, the WSWS warned that a government installed by
methods of lying and provocation, against the will of the people, would necessarily
conduct itself in the same way in both foreign and domestic policy. These
warnings have been vindicated again and again in the decade that has ensued: two illegal wars of aggression, in
Afghanistan and Iraq; the buildup of the police powers of the federal
government, on the pretext of the struggle against terrorism but in actuality
directed against the democratic rights of the American people; and in the
ever-widening social gulf in America between the financial elite and the
working people, culminating in the Wall Street crash of 2008 and the ongoing
slide into the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
Yes, stolen elections have deadly consequences. The Democratic Party establishment joined
with the Republican extreme right and ordered their Senators to stand down. If
one Senator contested the Fascist Five members of the Supreme Court, their
decision could have been reversed. Instead
three days after the Fascist Five’s coup, Senate Democrats under the direction
of Chuck Schumer passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000.
The
Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 is United States federal
legislation that ensured financial
products known as over-the-counter derivatives are unregulated, accelerating
the collapses of major financial companies. It was signed into law on
December 21, 2000 by President Bill Clinton. Wikipedia
The Democrat Establishment then joined ranks with the
Republicans and passed HAVA, Help America Vote Act that codified into law the
use of the privately owned, highly dubious vote counting machines across the
nation. What happened in Florida was too
messy, because democracy is messy. The
millionaire private individuals who own the vote tally machines have
proprietary rights over the software and the states using their machines have
no right to question the algorithms used.
Every election from 2000 on has been rigged. The two parties decide who will be president
in advance and then use HAVA to ensure the people’s choices are limited to the
two preordained candidates. The rigged system worked perfectly, no muss, no
fuss until 2016. Jeb Bush was supposed
to be the candidate but outsider Donald Trump kicked over the apple cart. Trump knocked off one establishment candidate
after another and was elected President defying the Swamp.
Well the establishment had tried, unsuccessfully to remove
Trump from office for the past four years.
This time around the establishment was overt in their election fraud and
do not care who knows it. There is a
cancer on the Democratic Republic. The
American government is now a fascist regime protected by the military
industrial complex. The CIA has used
color revolutions across the globe to removed democratically elected
governments who do not serve the interests of the global elite. What happened in Bolivia reflects what
happened in the 2020 election. From
Strategic Culture:
Excerpt:
Elon Musk’s Coup Stooge Áñez Arrested Trying to Escape Bolivian Justice
On November 24th, Elon Musk’s agent
and now deposed Bolivian coup leader
Jeanine Áñez was caught trying to escape justice by making her way to Brazil, but
was prevented from boarding a plane by a group of citizens who were able to
identify her in Trinidad.
Áñez was astoundingly prevented
from boarding a plane at the Jorge Henrich Arauz airport in the city of
Trinidad, as she was trying to go to a border city and then flee to Brazil.
There is likely to be more to this story, involving a small deal with Trinidad & Tobago’s intelligence
service, who appears to have informed a left-leaning activist group with ties
to Bolivia and Venezuela, to make the
‘citizen’s arrest’, so as to separate the state from the actual
arrest. Trinidad is a member of the U.S. led Caribbean Basin Security
Initiative (CBSI), invites significant U.S. foreign investment, and is likely
not to want to be seen as overtly involved.
These exciting events are now
transpiring as the result of what has become an ultimately failed coup attempt in Bolivia, a tragic year-long period
where democratic rule was upended.
Indeed, last month something
incredible happened. The Globalist’s golpe de estado failed, in what has been a
series of incredible failures world-wide. Among
their sought after bounty was Bolivia’s lithium wealth, valued in billions.
Bolivia is known to have somewhere between 50 to 80 percent of the world’s
lithium.
Goldman Sachs says that the global market demand for lithium could in
fact triple to some 570,000 tons a year in the next 10 years due to
electric vehicles. It’s no wonder that Elon Musk’s hands were all over it. But
nevertheless, Evo Morales made a come-back in at the end of October 2020, and
was able to overturn a coup (by way of law-fare) imposed on the country from
the Globalist deep state.
Summarizing it succinctly, Ramona
Wadi wrote for SCF last month;
“Bolivia has managed to overturn the neoliberal agenda which the U.S.
attempted to force upon the nation in the 2019 coup, which ousted former
President Evo Morales to install the far-right wing Jeanine Añez as president,
or dictator. While Chile was dealing with its state violence,
the Bolivian coup was out in the streets exerting its vengeance on the
country’s indigenous population. For months, Bolivians protested
against state violence and police repression. It is now the new government’s
obligation to bring the perpetrators to justice, while retracing Bolivia’s path
to its revolutionary progress.”
Besides being involved in an
unconstitutional coup, where the armed forces and the police conspired with
U.S. Deep-State agents to overthrow Evo Morales, Jeanine Áñez is also wanted in particular for killing of civilians in
Senkata and Sacaba.
And yet despite all this, western media – in backing the coup – painted
her as a symbol of a woman “breaking the glass ceiling”, and then she
doubled-down on virtue signaling by claiming without evidence that she had
‘contracted the coronavirus’, in what was no doubt both a sympathy ploy and a
signal to globalist elites that she was still their man, or woman, rather.
Of course we face a strange and
newly arisen contradiction in our terminology, where in Latin America
‘far-right’ means almost nothing like what it means inside the U.S. In Latin America, it describes an agent
of the bankers and foreign interests who undermine sovereignty, and who employ
the tactics of death squads and mass repression.
In Latin America, it is the ‘far right’ who view the common people as
the ‘deplorables’, and tend to view themselves as trying to maintain a
vestige of privilege bestowed on them by the legacy of Spanish colonialism on
the continent.
Despite her own obviously
indigenous features, Jeanine Áñez is among a certain upwardly mobile
demographic of La Paz’s urban petit-bourgeoisie whose blonde hair comes from
the bottle and not from the mother. While perhaps a seemingly trivial point for
those outside of Latin America, this
‘personality tick’ of hers has become a symbolic focus of outrage against her
coup, as it is emblematic of the disastrous neoliberal policies of its
petit-bourgeoisie who fetishize the downplaying of any indigenous roots. For
these reasons and more, the big news of her detention on November 24th was
widely celebrated by Bolivia’s underclass.
But others from her administration
have already successfully escaped justice. Defense
Minister Fernando Lopez who was critical in organizing the coup and who is
believed to have received millions from Elon Musk, has escaped to Brazil.
Last week, former de facto government minister Arturo Murillo, facing
corruption charges and more, successfully fled the country and arrived in
Panama. As a result of this, three
officials of the Bolivian Migration Directorate were arrested for allowing
these wanted fugitives to escape. Presently Bolivia is in both
diplomatic talks and litigation to push Panama and Brazil to return the ‘asylum
seekers’ to face justice in La Paz.
Following the inauguration of
Morales’ ally, the newly-elected Bolivian President Luis Arce, the corruption that prevailed during the de
facto government has been further revealed. At present, there are some 24 cases
open and being reviewed by courts.
Last October the Plurinational
Legislative Assembly moreover recommended
that the Public Prosecutor’s Office (Fiscalía) open a lawsuit against Añez for
the massacres of Cochabamba, Senkata, Sacaba, and El Alto, which all occurred
in November 2019. She stands accused
of committing the crimes of genocide, torture, and kidnappings.
Elements from within the armed
forces and the police were the primary ‘on the ground’ actors of the coup
d’état of November 10th, 2019. At the time in exile in Argentina and fearing
his own life, Evo Morales repeatedly
called for charges against those responsible for the massacre in El Alto.
Morales has denounced Bolivia’s high military commands for decorating and
honoring the “coup leaders,” who now stand accused in the massacring of
citizens.
The aim of these killings
ordered by Áñez was to strike fear in indigenous communities,
because of the mechanisms of the coup. MANY
COUP TACTICS ARE EMPLOYED DURING ELECTIONS, AS BEING SEEN RIGHT NOW IN THE U.S.
AGAINST DONALD TRUMP. It is an
opportune time because electronic voting devices, or the much older method of
controlling local political machines, are used to throw the vote towards an
otherwise unpopular leader – such as Biden.
But in the case of Bolivia, with
Añez who was backed by American plutocrat Elon Musk, the coup had to be arranged after the election because the re-election
of the wildly popular Morales was hard to contest. But in Bolivia, where
indigenous communities live protected from many of the depravities of
modernity, it is difficult to widely use
electronic voting. And more, the
local political machines are controlled by indigenous people who saw Evo
Morales as one of their own.
And so the coup relied upon the mid-century fascist tactics of the
death squad, torture, and classical repression. Elon Musk’s hopes were that the then
upcoming October 2020 elections could see a continuation of the Añez junta, if
sufficient numbers of Bolivian populists could be murdered.
But now with the come-back success
of Morales’ party with the assumption of the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS)
into power with Morales ally Luis Arce, the
promises to investigate the various crimes committed the year that Áñez was in
government are now coming to fruition.
Elon Musk, in search of
ever-cheaper access to lithium, got behind this brazen gilded-age act of
imperialist violence. He was eager to
oppose the will of millions of Bolivian voters, a base widely backed by its
indigenous population with its pre-Columbian culture.
Now the character of Elon Musk has
been difficult for some to discern, but what is abundantly clear is that he represents a breed of ‘entrepreneurs’ in
name only, who in fact rely on ‘socialism for the rich’, on subsidies and
government largesse. He has angled on themes that suit his own interests,
and his own interests alone. At times appearing to align with Trump’s populism
on space technology or against lockdowns, but
in fact got his start from deep connections with the Obama administration’s
mini ‘Green New Deal’, and the privatization of NASA resources that made Tesla
Motors and Space-X a possibility.
IT IS LAMENTABLE, OR AT THE VERY LEAST HYPOCRITICAL, THAT HE WOULD WORK
SO HARD TO SUBVERT ANY KIND OF SOCIALISM FOR THE POOR, as was the case when
he so enthusiastically supported the coup against Bolivian President Evo
Morales.
The successful prosecution of Áñez, who faces murder and kidnapping
charges, will help bring closure to a troubled, if brief, chapter in the
long trajectory of independence, national liberation, and self-determination
for Bolivia and its 11 million people.
Yep, that’s the kind of “democracy” America’s fascist
government exports around the world, thanks to the stolen election of
2000. The American fascists who are
trying and failing to overthrow the governments of South and Central America
were the same ones who Poppy Bush pardoned in Iran Contra.
The main reason the coup did not work in Bolivia is because “the
local political machines are controlled by indigenous people” who hand count their
ballots. That is why the American
fascists “relied upon the mid-century fascist tactics of the death squad,
torture, and classical repression.”
Now these fascist criminals are giving President Trump the “Evo
Morales treatment” if you can’t beat them at the polls kill them or overthrow
them. In Venezuela the US government decided
to just proclaim their stooge Juan Guido president, so why not do the same in
America? Make Joe Biden America’s Juan Guido.
Even a blind person could see America’s 2020 election was just another CIA color revolution. But with the American fascists just removing a popular president from office isn’t enough, he and his entire administration must be personally destroyed. From Paul Craig Roberts:
Excerpt:
Democrats and Media Abandon Democracy
Michigan State Attorney General
Dana Nessel has attributes of a Nazi.
She, like Washington Post columnist Randall D. Eliason, wants to falsely
prosecute attorneys who represent those making challenges to the election. She also wants to prosecute election
officials who refuse to certify until irregularities are properly dealt with,
and she wants to prosecute Pennsylvania Republican state officials who met with
Trump at the White House. In other words, Dana Nessel has proved herself
unfit for any public office by her effort to weaponize law for her political
agenda.
George Washington Law School
professor Jonathan Turley discusses Dana Nessel’s attempt to coerce Republicans
by threatening them with indictments.
Matthew Brann, a federal district judge appointed by Obama, refused to
accept Giuliani’s lawsuit against the Pennsylvania election fraud. The judge was not content to deny the case a
hearing. He used the occasion for a
propaganda attack, demonizing the lawsuit, based on affidavits from
witnesses who signed under penalty of perjury, as “speculative accusations
unsupported by evidence.”
The judge knows full well that
affidavits are always evidence. So we now have an Obama federal judge who
for political purpose pretends to be thoroughly ignorant of law and not
know that affidavits signed under penalty of perjury are always evidence.
The presstitutes are not
interested in Brann’s extraordinary pretense of utter ignorance, WHICH IF TRUE
WOULD DISQUALIFY HIM AS A JUDGE. Instead
they are using his ignorant pronouncement as “proof” that the legal team has no
evidence.
Democrats, who share Dana
Nessel’s determination to weaponize law and destroy democracy, are pushing
Biden, if he becomes president, to prosecute Trump and his supporters. Rep. Bill Pascrell, Democrat from New Jersey,
declared that “Donald Trump along with his worst enablers must be tried for
their crimes against our nation and Constitution.” IF THIS SOUNDS LIKE A SOUTH
AMERICAN BANANA REPUBLIC, THAT IS WHAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE TURNING US INTO.
Attempting to prosecute Trump, of course, is what the Democrats have
been doing for four years with Russiagate and Impeachgate without any evidence. Clearly, the Democrats envision a one-party
state under them in which the abuse of law for political purpose to which they
are giving birth cannot, in turn, be used against them. The Democrats are greasing the skids for
America to become the most corrupt country on earth.
The New York Times has scaled new
heights in Reality Denial.
For several years the World Economic
Forum, an elite organization, has been hyping the need for the “Great
Reset”. The Great Reset requires tremendous authoritarian power.
The elite organization has hosted
meetings, the purpose of which is to make the Reset seem inevitable, and has a
book published on the Great Reset. The appearance of Covid was used as added
reason for the Reset.
But no sooner than Klaus Schwab, a
leading exponent of the Great Reset, explained it to the Chicago Council on
Global Affairs than the New York Times
denied the very existance of such a thing, calling it a “far-right conspiracy
theory”
Perhaps the NY Times’ faux
journalists—they don’t have any real ones—got confused, thinking that the word was getting out on an elite plot and moved to
squash knowledge of the plot, not realizing that the WEF is hyping the
Reset as part of the sell.
Alternatively, we can conclude that
the NY Times’ journalists and editors are so ignorant that they are unaware of
the WEF’s big agenda item. These are the same journalists and editors
who are telling us that there is no evidence of election fraud and that America
was racist at birth.
Americans are faced with a
so-called Democrat political party that has abandoned America’s democratic
ways. Democrats have made a power grab for ideological purposes that are
hostile to principles such as election integrity which is essential for
democracy. Americans are also faced with the absence of a media that serves as
watchdog and reports objectively.
Without objective reporting,
Americans are denied the information that democracy requires to function.
Instead, the media controls explanations for the Democrats that support the
Democrats’ power grab. The picture is
clear that both Democrats and media have abandoned democracy because democracy
is a check on their agenda. They value
their agenda more than they value democracy, and they are going to force their
agenda down our throats whether we want it or not.
ACCORDING TO POLLS, A MAJORITY OF AMERICANS BELIEVE THE NOVEMBER 3
ELECTION WAS STOLEN BY THE DEMOCRATS.
If the Democrats succeed with their theft, whatever is left of public
confidence in American institutions will evaporate. After Clinton’s lies, 9/11, Saddam Hussein’s
weapons of mass destruction, Assad’s use of chemical weapons, Iranian nukes,
Russian invasions, Russiagate, Impeachgate, Covid, and now a stolen
presidential election, confidence in government must be close to
nonexistent. When there is no confidence
raw power takes over. If Democrats get
away with their theft of the election, we will have crossed the Rubicon.
Some say there has always been
voter fraud in American elections and ask what is new this time. What is new
this time is election fraud on a national level with the appearance of a plot
to create a one-party state. What is new
this time is the entirety of the media in support of the party that committed
the election fraud. What is new this time is the calls for prosecution of members of the
defrauded party. What we are witnessing is not only the suppression of evidence but
also the prosecution of those who present it.
Despite the evidence of election
fraud, the Democrats have a good chance to succeed with their theft. First of all, we all know that the media will
not present the case against the Democrats.
The media will continue to deny
that hundreds of affidavits are evidence.
Most Americans will never hear the story of the extraordinary audacity
that stole a presidential election.
Second, Trump is a populist, and
few populists in America have ever succeeded at the national level. Populists are in the way of the elite who
have more money and more influence. From the media’s perspective, Trump’s
majority are “deplorables”–racists and misogynists who must be overthrown. The fact that Trump is a Republican does
not mean that he has the support of the Republican Party.
Republicans have just as many feet
in the establishment as Democrats have.
To the establishment Trump is an outsider and, thereby, a potential
threat to their interest, just as his
intention to normalize relations with Russia was seen by the military/security
complex as a threat to their budget and power.
The absence of any Republican Party support for Trump is obvious in the
failure of the Barr Justice Department to bring (1) any indictments against the
government officials who orchestrated the Russiagate hoax and committed federal
felonies, (2) any indictments against Biden and his son for the corruption
evidenced in Hunter Biden’s laptop in the hands of the FBI, and (3) the lack of any Justice Department
interest in obvious election fraud backed up by hundreds of affidavits.
The Republican Establishment has
hung Trump out to dry and is urging him to concede.
A minority of Republican voters
themselves, although they regard the election as stolen, nevertheless believe
that Trump should concede and thereby preserve the undeserved reputation of
“American Democracy.” These feeble-minded people think that it is
not democracy itself that is at risk, but America’s reputation.
Over the course of my life I have
watched the politicization of the federal judiciary. Judges
are no longer appointed because they are competent to interpret law according
to the intent of Congress and the Constitution. They are appointed
according to whether they do or do not support abortion, racial and gender
quotas, homosexual marriage, open borders, amnesty for immigrant-invaders, the
globalist agenda, and so forth. The American judiciary is chosen according
to which party’s agendas are ascendant.
This is the way countries are destroyed.
Consider: if federal district judge Matthew Braun truly
believed that Trump’s legal team’s Pennsylvania lawsuit is invalid, the
partisan judge would accept the case and let its falsity be proven in court.
What better way to dispose of the charge? That he closed the court to the case despite
majority opinion of the public that the election was stolen is proof that he
knows the lawsuit is grounded in evidence.
So he suppresses the case instead of trying it.
When it is not only the Democrat Party
and media who don’t respect evidence but also federal courts, the basis for
evidence -based law no longer exists.
Instead, law is based on power. Who has
power has the law.
The country that the Democrats and media are birthing will not know
justice.
Indeed the country that Democrats and Never Trump
Republicans and media are birthing will not know justice. When the dust settle and America’s Juan Guido
is settled into office, the carnage America experienced under George W. Bush
and Barack Obama will resume. Joe Biden’s
Dark Winter will signal the end of the Democratic Republic that once was a
beacon of hope in the world. God Help
Us!
