The people in the United Kingdom have spoken and they have
opted for their freedom from the bondage of the CIA creation called the
European Union. America is not so lucky
we remain in bondage. The European Union
was a CIA creation devised after President Truman formed the CIA with the
purpose of destroying national sovereignty.
From David Stockman:
Excerpt:
The “European Movement,” which was
and still is the “grassroots” organization that
relentlessly pushed for the creation of a European super-state, was financed
to the tune of $1 million a year by the “American Committee for a United Europe”
(ACUE), which was founded by Allen Dulles …. who would become a CIA’s director…
Covert US financial support to the European federalist movement
never amounted to “less than half” of the various groups’ budgets. The money
was funneled through the Ford
Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and other private conduits…
The ACUE agitated for the Marshall
Plan – a giant serving of globaloney that funneled
billions of American taxpayer dollars to postwar Europe – sponsoring speaking tours by pro-unity
European politicians and cultural figures, and putting direct pressure on
Congress to release the funds. Radio programs, print media, and all forms of mass communication were utilized – at taxpayers’ expense – to push the
“European idea.”
Indeed, the American sponsors of this “European” project
directed every aspect of the pro-unity
Astro-turf “movement…” “Papers show
that it treated some of the EU’s ‘founding fathers’ as hired hands, and
actively prevented them finding alternative funding that would have broken
reliance on Washington.”
All of this ancient history should
give us a new perspective on current events. When thousands of demonstrators showed up in the streets of Kiev waving EU flags, and demanding the ouster of
President Viktor Yanukovych, there was nothing spontaneous about it. The “deep state” covert agencies of the
Western powers were in it up to their necks, of that we can be sure…
The fact of the matter is that it
is far easier for Washington to control
Europe with one central authority
at the reins than it is dealing with dozens of separate sovereignties. Indeed,
the very idea of national sovereignty
as the foundation of international relations is something the empire-builders of the Beltway, and
their bag-men in the capitals of Europe, would like to do away with…
The globalist idea is a central
canon of the War Party. For if national
borders are to be erased – and the very concept of national sovereignty
relegated to the dust heap of history – then the job of justifying Washington’s wars is made much easier.
That is the crux of the matter, without borders and national
identity wars are made easier. The
European Union is a pawn to subjugate the member states’ citizens to hideous
austerity and allow the pillaging of their wealth and natural resources. That is what makes the Brexit so earth
shattering and Donald Trump understands this.
From Express U.K.
Excerpt:
The UK has taken back their country: Trump congratulates Britain over
'great' Brexit vote
US presidential hopeful Donald Trump has congratulated the people
of Britain for taking back its country after the momentous Leave vote but
says he does not see Scotland voting for independence. The billionaire said "it is a great thing" because UK have "taken back
their country" as he touched down at his Trump Turnberry golf resort
in Scotland following Britain's decision to leave the European Union.
He arrived in his "Trump"
emblazoned helicopter at the Turnberry resort in South Ayrshire to officially
open the revamped resort he bought in 2014, just an hour after Prime Minister David Cameron sensationally announced his
decision to stand down in October…
He said Obama had been "bold" by endorsing the EU - a
mistake which led to this morning's result…
"I think a lot of people don't like him and I think if he had not
said it I think you're result might have been different." He added: "He got involved, I don't know
if that was through a friendship with David Cameron. "It could have been. I understand
friendship and I can understand why he did it, but I think it is something that
he shouldn't have done. "It's not his country, it's not his
part of the world…
"People are angry all over the world. They're angry over borders,
they're angry over people coming into the country and taking over and nobody
even knows who they are. "They're
angry about many, many things in the UK, the US and many other places.” "This will not be the last."
He said UK divisions "will
heal" as "it is a great place" adding: "I said this was
going to happen and I think it is a great thing. "Basically, they took back their
country. That's a great thing. "I
think we're doing very well in the United States also, and it is essentially the same thing that is happening in the United
States.
Trump is right of course, the people of the world are very
angry and don’t trust the oligarchs who have seized control of their
governments. That is what the Brexit
vote was about, not xenophobia that the corporate media monopoly is
pushing. That is how they divide people
call them racists if they “vote the wrong way”, i.e. against the status quo. The world is sick of Washington’s wars. From Sputnik News:
Excerpt:
Information continues to come in about the Brexit vote. A member of the
British Army said that 90% of the lads in his unit voted to leave.
They voted exit because they do not
believe they should be involved in Washington’s
wars. He said that his unit agreed that the wars are dictated by
Washington, via Brussels, and not by the British people. He also said that that the soldiers were “taking their own pen” to the
ballot box, because “they only use pencils at the polls and they could be
rubbed out and changed.”
Those British lads were wise to take their own pens to the
ballot box, their elections have been rigged just like the American elections
are rigged. But this time they used
paper ballots so Washington’s puppet Cameron couldn’t steal the election. From OpEd News:
Excerpt:
What's the Big Lesson of the UK
'Brexit' Vote for us in the US? It Was Accomplished with Paper Ballots
The decision by a majority of UK
voters to reject membership in the European Union in Wednesday's
hotly-contested referendum has been a devastating
defeat for the corporatist domination of the European political and
economic scene. It throws the corporate duopoly in the UK into turmoil, and
also has the EU bureaucrats and the banking
elite in Brussels and the financial capitals of Europe in a panic, lest other countries' voters, as in Spain and Italy, or
even France and the Netherlands, decide to follow suit.
And the reason the opponents of UK
membership in the EU were able to win against all that powerful opposition,
has, in no small part, to do with the fact that all the voting was done on paper ballots.
Compare that to the US, where voting, for the vast majority of people,
is done on machines, in many cases electronic machines that leave no paper
trail of individual votes, or even of vote totals per machine…
The lesson of Britain's 'Brexit'
referendum, like the hotly contested presidential election I witnessed and
covered in Taiwan in 2004, both of which contests were conducted using paper
ballots, and the latter which was subjected to a recount that returned an
almost identical result after tons of paper and millions of ballots were
painstakingly inspected and hand-counted all over again, is that democracy can only work if voting is
scrupulously honest and absolutely verifiable.
Americans cannot break out of the Wall Street bondage unless
they return to paper ballots. After the
American government was overthrown in 2000 congress passed the Help America
Vote (the right way) Act that codified into law the electronic vote tallying
machines that are privately owned. But
the corruption in our voting process doesn’t stop there. From Fortune:
Excerpt:
Wall Street Won't Let Elizabeth Warren Be Hillary Clinton's Vice
President
Democratic Wall Street donors are reportedly warning Hillary Clinton
not to choose Elizabeth Warren as her running mate. The Massachusetts senator has been one of the
most outspoken figures against the banking industry since the 2008 financial
crisis, and donors tell Politico that if Warren is the pick for vice president, it could really hurt Clinton’s donations.
One Democratic donor said putting
Warren on the ticket could drive Clinton’s entire Wall Street base away. Sheila
Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, says that could
be a huge problem for her. “Things are so volatile now with all of the outside
groups that all it can take is pissing
off one billionaire on Wall Street to make it difficult….”
Screw them, Hillary this campaign is not about how much
money you can raise, all that money is a negative. Get the money out of our elections, look at
Donald Trump he beat 16 candidates heavily financed by billionaires. Hillary 2016 is braindead, get rid of your high
paid advisors, you are running the worst campaign I have ever seen. From CNN:
Excerpt:
Trump's campaign dwarfed by Clinton's
Through the end of last month, the
period covered by the most recent FEC filings, Trump’s campaign spending was
less than a third of Clinton’s ($57 million to $182 million) and Trump had
assembled a staff about one-tenth the size of hers (70 employees to 732), and spent less on offices (Trump last month
paid $101,000 in rent vs. $328,000 for Clinton), the analysis found…
He did little to assemble the
trappings of a traditional campaign during a chaotic primary in which he
dispatched 16 rivals for the Republican presidential nomination, many of whom
ran more traditional, and expensive,
campaigns.
The $57 million Trump had spent
through the end of April is only slightly more than the $54 million spent by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who dropped out of
the race more than two months ago, and it’s far less than the $81 million spent by Ted Cruz. The
Texas senator assembled a sophisticated microtargeting machine that helped keep
him in the race until he dropped out this month, after being trounced by Trump in the Indiana primary.
Last month, as Trump was struggling
to put away Cruz, Trump’s campaign spent $2.7 million on advertising, while
Clinton spent $12 million on digital and broadcast media buys as she sought to
put away her rival for the Democratic nomination Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Yet Clinton’s campaign appeared to
be preparing for the general election, spending far less than Sanders, whose $207 million in total
spending marks him as the cycle’s biggest spender. He continued spending
briskly in April, dropping $38.6 million, compared to $23.9 million by Clinton.
Sanders spent almost twice as much as
Clinton on media and payroll (despite a slightly smaller staff), as well as
more on online advertising and direct mail.
And speaking of braindead, Paul Ryan the puppet of
billionaire oligarch’s is again pimping the oligarch’s plan to privatize social
security and raise the age for Medicare in his “Better Way” plan. When he speaks he speaks to his constituents,
“the haves and the have mores.” From The Atlantic:
Excerpt:
Paul Ryan Has a Plan, But No One Is Listening
Donald Trump’s oafish hegemony over the news cycle leaves little room
for the House speaker’s earnest pleas
to talk about congressional policy.
How do you put a crowd of
congressional interns to sleep? Gather them in the cool, quiet serenity of the
Capitol’s Statuary Hall and have them sit for an hour while a parade of House members delivers more or
less the same speech over and over and over again… at Thursday’s rollout of
the fourth piece of Speaker Paul Ryan’s “A Better Way” agenda—this one on how
Congress must reclaim its constitutional authority—did not actually doze off.
But as the event ground on, many
visibly zoned out or turned their attentions to texting or perusing Snapchat.
At one point, the young woman next to me
(one of a trio of interns from Representative Joe Wilson’s office) stopped bothering to glance up from her
phone when it came time to applaud; she’d simply clap in the general direction
of the podium, eyes glued to the screen balanced on her lap…
Thursday, with way too many lawmakers on hand to sing the same
basic notes: The Constitution rocks, unelected bureaucrats are bad, and
executive overreach is ruining America. Only the examples of regulatory outrage
varied, based on each speaker’s home district: Keith Rothfus of Pennsylvania’s
12th denounced the burdens on coal
plants; Doug Collins of Georgia’s 9th talked about poultry-farming regulations; Bradley Byrne of Alabama’s 1st
bemoaned the tightening of red-snapper season; French Hill of Arkansas’s 2nd shredded the Environmental Protection
Agency’s Clean Water Rule; and so on…
As the logic goes in Congress: Why
have just three or four lawmakers explain a proposal when a dozen or more will happily hold forth for the cameras? Which guarantees redundancy and tedium, but
makes perfect sense when you consider that Ryan’s
entire “A Better Way” project is a grand exercise in messaging that, in
addition to positioning his conference as the party of ideas, is also meant to give individual members a chance
to impress the voters back home with all the deep policy thinking they’ve
done.
Unbelievably braindead but that is what you get when big
money is allowed to buy our politicians.
Dumb asses. Donald Trump gets it,
he is a political genius planning his trip to Scotland to coincide with the
Brexit vote. Absolutely brilliant,
landing his “Trump helicopter” as the Brexit vote was announced. But in America this is how the billionaire-owned
corporate press is reporting on Trump. From the Washington Whore Post:
Excerpt:
In new poll, support for Trump has plunged, giving Clinton a
double-digit lead
Support for Donald Trump has plunged as he has alienated fellow Republicans and large majorities of
voters overall in the course of a month of self-inflicted controversies,
propelling Democrat Hillary Clinton to a double-digit lead nationally in a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
The survey finds sweeping unease with the presumptive
Republican nominee’s candidacy — from his incendiary rhetoric and values to his handling of both terrorism
and his own business — foreshadowing that the November election could be a
referendum on Trump more than anything else.
Roughly two in three Americans say
they think Trump is unqualified to lead the nation; are anxious about the idea
of him as president; believe his
comments about women, minorities and Muslims show an unfair bias; and see his
attacks on a federal judge because of his Mexican American heritage as racist.
Nearly one-third of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents say Trump
is unqualified for office, and 18 percent say he does not represent their beliefs, exposing deep fissures in the
GOP base as Trump struggles to unite conservatives going into next month’s
national convention in Cleveland.
The lobotomized Washington Post is one of the worst, most
biased, anti-Trump rags on the market. Owned
by right-wing billionaire Jeff Bezos, they have advocated for non-natural born American
citizens being eligible for the American Presidency and backed Canadian TedCruz so that tripe is not surprising. So
let’s see what Larry Johnson has to say at his blog “No Quarter.”
Excerpt:
BREXIT–A Harbinger of a Trump Victory?
What the voters did to the
establishment and the elite narrative in the U.K. is comparable to what voters in the United States are likely to
do to the establishment here when they vote for Trump. The voters in the
U.K were angry at the European Union
passing and trying to enforce laws on
the average person in the U.K. that, from the standpoint of those average souls, was unjust interference in their liberty.
There also was anger at stagnating economic conditions and the favoritism being
shown towards immigrants at the expense of British nationals.
The vote to leave the E.U. was seen
as an act of defiance against the
internationalists and the status quo. We are seeing this same phenomena in
the United States and, just like the elite in the U.K., our own power brokers are ignoring the looming Tsunami of voter anger.
If you watched the coverage of the
aftermath of this voting massacre of
the status quo you would have felt you were on the threshold of Dante’s Inferno
because the pundits were screaming, “Abandon all hope ye who enter here.” While
there is likely to be short term economic turmoil with currencies fluctuating
up and down, this probably will not be the financial disaster that the elite
are predicting, at least in the U.K.
The short term effect in the United
States is that U.S. dollar will be further strengthened. That means we will pay
less for foreign oil but the effective price of things made in the United
States will increase. That means fewer exports and a damper on manufacturing
here. On the other hand, our financial
institutions will have ample supplies of dollars and, in theory, should be
able to make a lot of loans which
could in turn have a stimulative effect on the economy.
The real effect is the political
fallout. This marks the beginning of the
end of the European Union. Time to short that bad boy. France and Spain
will likely be the next to exit and, once different countries start heading for
the political exit, the E.U. will fall apart.
Thursday also was a horrible day for Barack Obama. Mr. Nobel
Prize’s exhortations for U.K. voters to stick with the E.U. were rebuffed.
Although the media sought to portray the vote outcome as “razor thin,” at 52%
win normally, in the U.S., is described as a significant, major victory. In
2012 Obama won 51.1% of the vote compared to Romney’s 47.2% and I do not
remember anyone on the Democrat side insisting that Obama eked out a narrow win…
The rejection of the status quo in
the U.K. is comparable to the rejection of the status quo here in the United
States. And Hillary Clinton is the
status quo candidate, which is why she will not win in November barring a
complete collapse of Trump.
The political left loves
“Globalization” and the myth that everyone is the same. In truth the Globalization push favors the large
corporate and financial interests at the expense of the poor and the middle
class. That inequity has sparked this 21st Century revolt and is a major
force driving the success of the Trump.
Thank you Britain, you have shaken off your chains and
sternly rebuked the CIA’s European Union criminal enterprise and have shown
Americans the way to freedom. The only
question now is, will America demand that their votes be counted in November or
will they remain in bondage?
By Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment