The foreign and domestic policies of America since the
neocons and neoliberals seized control December 12, 2000 has been an
unmitigated disaster for America. In every
election campaign Democrats and Republicans alike have lionized North Korea,
Russia and Iran in order to create boogie men that justified trillions in
spending for the military industrial complex.
Every administration has demonized Russia and Iran as the greatest
threat to world peace.
Both GOP and Dem administrations have attacked small
countries that posed no threat to America to engorge their financial backers at
the expense of the American economy, national security and humanity.
In 2016 President Donald Trump campaigned against the Deep
State status quo and won. The fruits of
Trump’s labor blessed America this week when President Trump levied tariffs on
foreign steel and aluminum and then announced he is willing to meet with Kim
Jong Un of North Korea.
The failed policies of the past have caused financial and
physical devastation across the planet.
Many are pleased to welcome a new day in America. Not so for the Deep State and its operatives
in the media and in the many Washington think tanks who control the majority of
congress. For the masters of war it is time
for hysteria and increased attacks on Trump using the Mueller witch hunt and
character assassination just as they did to President Clinton in the 1990’s.
This is not the 1990’s this is today and Donald Trump is not
Bill Clinton. Trump is not wedded to
either party and is a strong, independent capable leader. The lunatic fringes of the two parties will
not be able to impeach President Trump for having an affair like they did to
President Clinton. This is a new day.
President Vladimir Putin displayed Russia’s highly advanced
military equipment that Russia was able to produce while America was bogged
down in multiple wars while spending trillions on military equipment
development while their infrastructure crumbled at home.
The difference between Russia and America is that, while
spending a fraction of what America spends enriching contractors, Russia’s
military equipment is far superior to America’s overpriced failures. President Putin put America’s political dilemma
succinctly into focus saying “America is eating itself up.” From Veterans Today:
Excerpt:
Putin: US political system “eating
itself up”
Putin should be credited with making a positive difference in the
political landscape. Granted, he does have his shortcomings, as we all do.
But he has continued to tell the truth about the New World Order and its most
revealing puppet, the United States of America.
Putin has recently declared that
the U.S. political system has “demonstrated its inefficiency and has been
eating itself up.”[1] That is a bold and factual statement, and one needn’t be
a politician to realize that the U.S.
“has been eating itself up” since the first time it embarked on an
imperialist/Zionist mission in the Middle East and elsewhere.
As I have argued elsewhere, the
United States overthrew a democratically elected government in Iran in 1953. We
destroyed Iraq in 2003; we literally created chaos in Libya; we made a mess in
Afghanistan; we created sodomy at Abu
Ghraib; we almost went crazy because Assad is still alive and well in
Syria.
All those wars have serious
consequences, and the only people who
will pay a huge price are the average American, not the Neocons and
Israelis who were pushing those wars in the first place. In fact, those Jewish
Neocons don’t give a damn about you, your country, your children, and your
future.
This is not my opinion at all.
Perhaps we should summon Jewish Neocon Jonah Goldberg once again. Quoting
approvingly another Jewish Neocon by the name of Michael Ledeen, Goldberg
declared: “Every ten years or so, the
United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it
against the wall, just to show the world
we mean business.”[2]
Goldberg continued: “Saddam Hussein
deserved to be overthrown by the United States at the end of the Gulf War, and
it does not seem to me that a statute of limitations has expired on that
verdict.”[3]
It was calculated that the Iraq War will cost America at least
six-trillion dollars.[4] Goldberg’s response? Well, you guessed it: “Iraq
was a worthy mistake.”[5]
Neocons like Goldberg want to kill,
steal, and destroy. They invent conflicts where there are no conflicts, and
they create monsters and then destroy them—all in the name of “democracy” and
“freedom.” They are always interested in
creating multi-million dollar jobs for the military industrial complex, which
never ceases to see monsters and terrorists everywhere in the Middle East.[6]
What has the average American
gotten in return? Well, we all know that we
have already passed the $20 trillion mark when it comes to debt. Sounds
like Putin was right on target when he stated that the Deep State is actually
“eating itself up.”
The Zionists in the Democratic and Republican Parties care nothing
about the American people, nor any people for that matter. Both
refuse to pursue peaceful resolutions to conflict. This attitude was borne out
of the great election theft of 2000 that opened the door for the “Pearl
Harbor-like event” of 911 attacks that kicked off the New World Order concocted
by the Zionist cabal. That was the
Bush/Obama Doctrine of preemptive war.
From Patrick Buchanan:
Excerpt:
Time to Get Over the Russophobia
George W. Bush abrogated the
Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty that Richard Nixon had negotiated, Putin
responded with a buildup of the
offensive missiles he put on display last week.
The U.S. helped to instigate the Maidan Square coup that dumped over
the elected pro-Russian government in Ukraine.
To prevent the loss of his Sebastopol naval base on the Black Sea,
Putin countered by annexing the Crimean Peninsula.
After peaceful protests in Syria
were put down by Bashar Assad, we sent
arms to Syrian rebels to overthrow the Damascus regime. Seeing his last
naval base in the Med, Tartus, imperiled, Putin came to Assad’s aid and helped
him win the civil war…
Russia is acting again as a great
power. And she sees us as a nation that
slapped away her hand, extended in friendship in the 1990s, and then
humiliated her by planting NATO on her front porch. Yet, what is also clear is that Putin hoped
and believed that, with the election of Trump, Russia might be able to restore
respectful if not friendly relations with the United States. Clearly, Putin wanted that, as did Trump.
Yet, with the Beltway hysteria over hacking of the DNC and John Podesta
emails, and the Russophobia raging in this capital, we appear to be paralyzed
when it comes to engaging with Russia. The
U.S. political system, said Putin this week, “has been eating itself up.” Is
his depiction that wide of the mark?
What is the matter with us?
Three years after Nikita Khrushchev
sent tanks into Budapest to drown the Hungarian revolution in blood, Eisenhower was hosting him on a 10-day
visit to the USA. Two years after
the Berlin Wall went up, and eight months after Khrushchev installed missiles
in Cuba, Kennedy reached out to the Soviet dictator in his widely praised
American University speech.
Lyndon Johnson met with Russian President Alexei Kosygin in
Glassboro, New Jersey, just weeks after we almost clashed over Moscow’s threat
to intervene in the Arab-Israeli War of 1967. Six months after Leonid Brezhnev
sent tank armies to crush the Prague Spring in August 1968, an inaugurated
Nixon was seeking detente.
In those years, no matter who was
in the White House or Kremlin, the U.S.
establishment favored engagement with Moscow. It was the right that was
skeptical or hostile… Russians today
enjoy freedoms of speech, assembly, religion, travel, politics, and the press
that the generations before 1989 never knew…
Japan negotiates with Putin’s
Russia over the southern Kuril Islands lost at the end of World War II. Bibi Netanyahu has met many times with
Putin, though he is an ally of Assad, whom Bibi would like to see ousted,
and has a naval and air base not far from Israel’s border.
We Americans have far more fish to
fry with Russia than Bibi. Strategic
arms control. De-escalation in the
Baltic, Ukraine and the Black Sea. Ending the war in Syria. North Korea.
Space. Afghanistan. The Arctic. The war on terror.
Yet all we seem to hear from our
elite is endless whining that Putin has not been sanctioned enough for
desecrating “our democracy.”
Get over it.
This insane foreign policy of not talking to your
adversaries can no longer be tolerated.
There is no reason not to talk with Kim Jong Un of North Korea. It is the Zionist cabal that wants to keep
the cash flowing into the war coffers that is preventing the talks from
happening. From Consortium News:
Excerpt:
Who’s Afraid of Talking With Kim
Jong Un?
Americans should welcome President
Trump’s apparent willingness to speak with North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, but instead naysayers are warning of dire
consequences, Jonathan Marshall explains.
Three months ago, I quoted
approvingly Donald Trump’s campaign
pledge to supporters in Atlanta that he would “absolutely” speak to North
Korean leader Kim Jong Un even if there were only a “10 percent or a 20
percent chance that I can talk him out of those damn nukes.” “What the hell is wrong with speaking?” the
candidate said. “We should be eating a hamburger on a conference table.”
This week, the ever-mercurial President Trump agreed to take Kim up on a
surprise offer to meet face-to-face in two months to search for peace. The
meeting will be the first ever held between the leaders of the United States
and North Korea, two countries that remain technically at war.
Whether the two men agree to eat
hamburgers or kimchi, Americans should applaud Trump’s renewed willingness
to talk rather than fight. Instead, all manner of naysayers are warning of
potentially dire consequences. A few of their points have merit, but none outweigh the likely consequences of
doing nothing to stop an impending war…
In recent months, experts have put the odds of a catastrophic
war—which would likely kill hundreds of thousands of Americans in addition to
countless Koreans and Japanese—at between 25 and 50 percent…
Yet instead of hailing the prospect
of talks as a great win for the life expectancy of people on both sides of the
Pacific, some analysts insist on
treating Kim’s proposal as a zero sum game.
“By some assessments, this is really a victory for Kim, who for
years has sought proof of his status and North Korea’s power by dangling the
offer of leader-to-leader talks with the United States,” writes Karen DeYoung,
senior national security correspondent for the Washington Post.
And liberal New York Times
columnist Nicholas Kristof, while
claiming that he is “all for negotiations,” focuses on his “fear” that Trump
“has given North Korea what it has long craved: the respect and legitimacy
that comes from the North Korean leader standing as an equal beside the
American president.”
Does Kristof really think peace
will be easier to achieve by disrespecting Kim and insisting on his
illegitimacy? Deep down, does Kristof
care more about one-upmanship than preventing nuclear war?
Will Trump Flub the Deal?
Many critics also warn that North
Korea will take advantage of Trump’s ignorance and lack of preparation to gain
some unspecified advantage. “President Trump’s infamous penchant for
going off script and his admiration of authoritarian types could weaken our negotiating position,”
declared Suzanne DiMaggio of the Washington-based New America Foundation, who
helped arrange backdoor diplomatic contacts between the two countries last
year.
Zack Beauchamp, a news analyst for
Vox.com, warns that Trump is “very easy to manipulate” and “easily swayed by
flattery,” weaknesses that make it “easy
to imagine the North Koreans tricking Trump into a deal that, in the long
term, helps their strategic position while hurting America’s.”
Not to be outdone, senior White
House and national security reporters for CNN caution, “there’s a real chance Trump could be walking into a massive trap…”
But what is Trump likely to bargain
away out of ignorance or vanity? Perhaps,
critics fear, he will relax sanctions, agree to scale back military exercises
with South Korea, or start exploring a long-term peace deal with North Korea
before first nailing down iron-clad guarantees of North Korean nuclear
disarmament. But none of those measures would put the security of South Korea, much
less the United States, at risk…
Trump should go into the talks with
the more modest but absolutely vital aim
of heading off an impending war. Realistic near-term goals include freezing
further missile and warhead testing by North Korea and eliciting guarantees
against proliferation of North Korea’s technology to other countries.
To achieve those ends, he may
need—in consultation with Seoul—to restrain U.S.-South Korean war exercises and
partially relax sanctions. He and Kim should also map out a reasonable
timetable for negotiating a final peace settlement between our countries. But Trump should refuse to let critics at
home dissuade him from seeking an alternative to war.
I can't help but wonder if the Kim Jong Un offer to meet
with Trump is in part due to Putin’s display of strength. With the warming of relations between North
and South during the Olympics and the confidence that Russia could provide
protection from an American attack its possible he doesn’t feel the need for
nukes. Putin certainly has some
American politicians worried. From Russia Today:
Excerpt:
‘Urgently engage with Russia’: US senators call for dialogue after new
nuclear arsenal unveiled
A group of US lawmakers have called
for strategic dialogue with Moscow. They
feel that the matter is “more urgent” following Russian President Vladimir
Putin’s unveiling of a number of cutting-edge weapons systems.
“A US-Russia Strategic Dialogue is more urgent following President
Putin’s public address on March 1st when he referred to several new nuclear
weapons Russia is reportedly developing, including a cruise missile and a
nuclear underwater drone,” a letter signed by US Senators Edward J. Markey
(D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
reads.
The letter, addressed to US
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, was published on Thursday. The senators
stressed that while the countries have many “significant” disagreements,
including alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 US elections and the
“annexation” of Crimea, Moscow and
Washington need to come to the negotiation table.
“Due to these policy rifts, not in
spite of them… the United States should
urgently engage with Russia to avoid miscalculation and reduce the
likelihood of conflict.” The lawmakers
are concerned that some of the brand-new Russian nuclear weapons are not
covered by the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, commonly known as the New
START, and thus call for the agreement to be extended. The weapons in question
include a cruise missile with virtually
no range limit and a nuclear-powered underwater drone.
However, the letter did not miss a
chance to accuse Russia of non-compliance with the 1982 Intermediate-Range
Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), and called on the State Department to address the
alleged violation. Moscow and Washington
have traded accusations of INF-Treaty violations for several years…
There had been rumors that the Russian
and American top diplomats, Sergey Lavrov and Rex Tillerson respectively, may
meet while they are both in Africa. However,
the US State Department denied that there had been any discussion of possible
bilateral talks. When asked about it, the Russian Foreign Minister said the
claims that such discussions never happened are “untrue.”
On March 1, the Russian leader
presented a set of advanced Russian nuclear weapons, some of which are not yet
named. During his state of the nation address, Putin stressed that Russia would not need all these new weapons had
its legitimate concerns been heeded by the US and its allies. “Nobody
wanted to talk to us about the root of the problem. Nobody listened to us; so
listen to us now!” he said.
The speech drew a hysterical reaction from the Western media and
accusations of saber-rattling and starting “a new arms race,” Putin told
NBC Washington was in fact to blame for it. The Russian president referred to
the US decision to withdraw from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM
Treaty) back in 2002.
What did Americans think would happen when that idiot W.
Bush and lunatic Dick Cheney unilaterally withdrew from the ABM Treaty and
announced a new policy of preemptive war?
What did they think would happen after Bush’s idiotic Axis of Evil
speech threatening North Korea? This all
goes back to the great election theft of 2000.
North Korea’s economy isn’t the only one suffering from America’s belligerent
bellicose policies. America is on the
brink of financial collapse. From Covert Geopolitics:
Excerpt:
Unprecedented Trump and Kim Meeting
on NK DeNuclearization Soon!
There is now talk about a North Korea-US dialogue on a possible peaceful resolution
of the Korean conflict with the US. The NK leader is said to be committed
to putting a stop on the series of nuclear testing, after a series of talks
conducted between the two Koreas.
Any action towards peace is always
highly appreciated. But will the Deep
State just sit idly by and do nothing? It’s
too early to conclude that this will be an indication that the White House may
be departing itself from the Deep State control for good. Or, that the Deep
State is indeed losing control of its US intelligence and military arm. But if
peace will come to the fore, then it will be the harbinger of great things to
come.
No, it’s not only the North Korean
economy is collapsing as the video suggests, but also that of the US.
·
Imminent collapse of US dollar & other major
currencies will push gold to $10,000 – bullion analyst.
Meanwhile, Ghouta Syria is still
burning. Fortunately, the Syrians there
are openly resisting the CIA Al Nusra militants’ desperate attacks. Some analysts are saying that this is the
endgame in Syria.
In 2016 President Donald Trump campaigned against the Deep
State status quo and won. The fruits of
Trump’s labor blessed America this week when President Trump levied tariffs on
foreign steel and aluminum and then announced he is willing to meet with Kim
Jong Un of North Korea. The foreign
policy launched in America in 2001 has been an unmitigated disaster and it’s
time to reach out to our adversaries with an olive branch not the same old
dinged up rusty iron fist. Peace and
prosperity begins at home, time to invest in America. God Bless.
By Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment