War is a Racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily
the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international
in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and
the losses in lives. It has been estimated by statisticians and economists that
the war yielded $16 Trillion in Profits. That is how the 21,000 Billionaires
and millionaires got that way. This $16 Trillion in Profits is not to be
sneezed at. It is quite a tidy sum. ~~ Smedley D Butler
The Deep State’s agents who infest the various Stink Tanks
who advocate for endless war with the enemy du jour have become mighty rich and
will not allow the taxpayer funded spigot to be shut off. There’s gold in them thar war hills. Since George W. Bush was installed by five
crooked partisans on the Supreme Court which has become an extension of the RNC
and DNC, America has been involved in endless, non-declared wars across the
globe. With each RAND Corporation
instigated conflict the profits rise exponentially and America sinks deeper
into a sea of debt.
President Donald J. Trump is a threat to those ill-gotten
gains. Trump has rolled out his Peace Train
and is gathering steam as he rumbles down the tracks. Now the Deep States agents are dynamiting the
tracks with endless attacks based on lies to derail the peace train. From Consortium News:
Excerpt:
Evidence Will Probably Never Be Produced in Indictments of ‘Russian
Agents’
The indictment of 12 Russian
‘agents,’ which included no collusion
with Trump’s team, is essentially a political and not legal document because
it is almost certain the U.S. government will never have to present any
evidence in court, reports Joe Lauria.
Charges against 12 Russian
intelligence agents for allegedly hacking emails from the Democratic Party
during the 2016 presidential election were announced
by the U.S. Justice Department on Friday at the very moment President Donald
Trump was meeting Queen Elizabeth II at Windsor Castle and just days before
a summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki.
A central claim of Russia-gate has been that the Russian government
with help from the Trump campaign stole
emails from the Democratic Party and the Hillary Clinton campaign and then
gave those emails to WikiLeaks for publication to damage Clinton’s quest for
the White House.
Until Friday however, the
investigation into the allegations had produced no formal indictment of Russian
government interference in the election. Like
previous U.S. government accusations against Russia for alleged election
meddling, the indictment makes
assertions without providing evidence. Under U.S. law, indictments
are not considered evidence. And it is highly unlikely that the government will
ever have to produce any evidence in court…
Clinging to ‘Collusion’
The lack of evidence that the Trump
campaign was colluding with Russia has never stopped Democrats and their media
outlets from believing unnamed U.S. intelligence sources for two years about
such collusion. “Collusion” is the title
of a best-selling book about the supposed Trump-Russia conspiracy to steal the
election, but such a charge is not to be found…
But even after Friday’s indictments failed to charge anyone from Trump’s
team, the Democratic media continued to insist there was collusion… If
Russia is indeed guilty of remotely hacking the emails it would have had no
evident need of assistance from anyone on the Trump team, let alone a public
call from Trump on national TV to commence the operation…
The timing of the announcement was clearly intended to embarrass Trump as he was
meeting the Queen and to undermine his upcoming meeting with Putin on July 16.
The indictments may also have been meant to embarrass Russia two days before
the World Cup final to be held in Moscow.
Pressure was immediately brought on
Trump to cancel the summit in light of the indictments, which may have been the
main aim in the timing of their announcement. “Glad-handing with Vladimir Putin on the heels of these indictments
would be an insult to our democracy,” Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said in
a statement less than an hour after
the indictments were announced. “President Trump should cancel his
meeting with Vladimir Putin until Russia takes demonstrable and transparent steps
to prove that they won’t interfere in future elections,” Schumer said.
With no apparent irony, The New
York Times reported, “The timing of the indictment … added a jolt of tension to
the already freighted atmosphere surrounding Mr. Trump’s meeting with Mr.
Putin. It is all but certain to feed into the conspiratorial views held by the
president and some of his allies that Mr.
Mueller’s prosecutors are determined to undermine Mr. Trump’s designs for a
rapprochement with Russia.”
The Russian government on Friday
strongly denied the charges. In a statement,
the Foreign Ministry called the indictments “a shameful farce” that was not
backed up by any evidence. “Obviously, the goal of this ‘mud-slinging’ is
to spoil the atmosphere before the Russian-American summit,” the statement
said. The Ministry added that the 12
named Russians were not agents of the GRU.
“When you dig into this indictment
… there are huge problems, starting with how in the world did they identify 12
Russian intelligence officers with the GRU,” said former CIA analyst Larry
Johnson in an interview with Consortium News. Johnson pointed out that the U.S.
Defense Intelligence Agency was not allowed to take part in the January 2017
Intelligence Community Assessment on alleged interference by the GRU.
Only hand-picked analysts from the FBI, the NSA and the CIA were
involved. “The experts in the intelligence community on the GRU … is the
Defense Intelligence Agency and they were not allowed to clear on that
document,” Johnson said…
The indictment makes clear the evidence of an alleged hack of the DNC
and DCCC computers did not come from the FBI, which was never given access
to the computers by the DNC, but instead from the private firm CrowdStrike,
which was hired by the DNC. It is referred to as Company 1 in the indictment…
Dimitri Alperovitch, a CrowdStrike
co-founder, is also a senior fellow at
the anti-Russian Atlantic Council think tank…
CrowdStrike claimed the alleged Russian intelligence operation was
extremely sophisticated and skilled in concealing its external penetration of
the server. But CrowdStrike’s conclusion about Russian “fingerprints” resulted
from clues that would have been left
behind by extremely sloppy or amateur hackers–or inserted intentionally to
implicate the Russians…
Other apparent sources for
information in the indictment are intelligence agencies, which normally create
hurdles in a criminal prosecution… If the U.S. invoked the states secret
privilege so that classified evidence could not be revealed in court a conviction
before a civilian jury would be jeopardized.
Such a trial is extremely unlikely
however. That makes the indictment
essentially a political and not a legal document because it is almost
inconceivable that the U.S. government will have to present any evidence in
court to back up its charges. This is simply because of the extreme
unlikelihood that arrests of Russians living in Russia will ever be made…
It is not only allies of Trump, as
the Times thinks, who believe the timing of the indictments, indeed the
entire Russia-gate scandal, is intended to prevent Trump from pursuing detente
with nuclear-armed Russia. Trump
said of the indictments that, “I think that really hurts our country and it
really hurts our relationship with Russia. I think that we would have a chance
to have a very good relationship with Russia and a very good chance — a very
good relationship with President Putin.”
There certainly appear to be powerful forces in the U.S. that want to
stop that.
After the collapse of the Soviet
Union in 1991, Wall Street rushed in
behind Boris Yeltsin and Russian oligarchs to asset strip virtually the entire
country, impoverishing the population. Amid widespread accounts of this
grotesque corruption, Washington intervened in Russian politics to help get
Yeltsin re-elected in 1996. The political
rise of Vladimir Putin after Yeltsin resigned on New Year’s Eve 1999 reversed
this course, restoring Russian sovereignty over its economy and politics.
That inflamed American hawks whose
desire is to install another Yeltsin-like figure and resume U.S. exploitation
of Russia’s vast natural and financial resources. To advance that cause, U.S. presidents have supported the eastward
expansion of NATO and have deployed 30,000 troops on Russia’s border.
In 2014, the Obama administration helped orchestrate a coup that toppled the
elected government of Ukraine and installed a fiercely anti-Russian regime.
The U.S. also undertook the risky policy of aiding jihadists to overthrow a
secular Russian ally in Syria. The consequences have brought the world closer
to nuclear annihilation than at any time since the Cuban missile crisis in
1962.
In this context, the Democratic Party-led Russia-gate
appears to have been used not only to explain away Clinton’s defeat but to stop
Trump — possibly via impeachment or by inflicting severe political damage —
because he talks about cooperation with
Russia.
Yep, the indictments are just another load of crap delivered
by Mueller to derail the Trump Peace Train.
The indictments are thin gruel with no evidence, just unsubstantiated
allegations. This is really an
indictment of the highly politicized America’s intelligence agencies ushered in
by George W. Bush and Barack Obama. If
the intelligence agencies were serious about investigating collusion in the
2016 Presidential election they’d be looking at the DNC, the CIA and the Queen’s
MI6. From Black Agenda Report:
Excerpt:
Freedom Rider: British Collusion and Criminality
“Collusion continues not between
Trump and Russians, but between intelligence agencies, the media and American
politicians with hidden agendas.”
Most people believe that Donald
Trump owes his presidency to Russian activity because they have been told this
repeatedly for the past two years. There was indeed high level collusion taking
place in the 2016 presidential campaign but it wasn’t carried out by Trump. It
was Hillary Clinton and the Democratic
National Committee who acted in concert with intelligence assets in the United
States and in the United Kingdom.
The British government continues to manufacture false flag incidents,
force international agencies to do its bidding, and push for regime change in
Syria. Having failed to defeat Trump, they kept up the campaign to cover their
tracks, escape blame for Hillary Clinton’s failure, and maintain the foreign
policy status quo.
A law firm retained by the
Democratic National Committee paid for the opposition research undertaken by
former MI6 agent, Christopher Steele. Steele
produced a dossier alleging that Trump was compromised by the Russian
government and shopped it to the FBI, CIA, influential journalists and
politicians like Senator John McCain. The dossier was used to obtain a FISA
surveillance warrant against Trump aide Carter Page but the DNC connection was
not disclosed to the judge.
“Hillary Clinton and the Democratic
National Committee acted in concert with
intelligence assets in the United States and in the United Kingdom.”
Steele isn’t the only British spook
in the story. A man named Richard Dearlove,
former head of MI6, is a business partner of Stefan Halper, a CIA asset who
also spied on Donald Trump. Halper had contacts with Page and George
Papadopoulos, two men now under indictment by Robert Mueller’s special
investigation. The lesser lights of the Trump team were no match for seasoned
professionals who get protection from the New York Times. The Times calls
Halper “an FBI informant ” and tries to claim that is somehow different from
being a spy…
While Russia is vilified at every
turn the British government conducts very public and very shady business which
could conceivably impact both countries. The case of former Russian double
agent Sergei Skripal has the British
government’s finger prints all over it. There is no reason for Russia to
poison a former spy whom they had swapped eight years earlier.
The only logical conclusion is that
the act was carried out with the goal of embarrassing Vladimir Putin and creating a possible pretext for war. The
Skripal case was soon followed by questionable reporting of yet another
chemical weapons attack in Syria which resulted in a short lived United States,
British and French attack on that country…
It is the British who use lies and trickery to sway public opinion into
supporting a wider war in Syria. Three months after the Skripals were
attacked another pair of Britons are said to have been poisoned with Novichok,
a chemical weapon originally produced by Russia but which now can be made
anywhere. One of the victims died and the claims of Russian involvement have
suddenly become much more dangerous.
This second poisoning took place less than one week after the UK
pressured the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) to
take on the role of judge and juror. No longer will the OPCW just determine
if chemical weapons have been used, but they will also be tasked with assigning
blame, too. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson proudly stated, “The U.K. has led
the diplomatic efforts to secure this action.”
Collusion continues not between Trump and Russians, but between
intelligence agencies, the media and American politicians with hidden agendas. While
the public are fed a steady diet of tales of an unfree press in Russia, it is the
British press which has been censored by its government…
While Americans are given endless misinformation making Russia look like the
foreign interloper in their nation’s affairs it is actually the British deep
state that is well connected to American media and politicians.
The Russiagate purveyors constantly
say, “Connect the dots.” If there are
any dots to connect they run from the DNC to former MI6 spies to CIA assets to
Russian double agents to American intelligence to alleged chemical weapons attacks
used to justify war or to stop the
upcoming Trump and Putin summit. It is all being used to further the
now obligatory anti-Russian propaganda that is pervasive on both sides of the
Atlantic.
Trump would be wise to revisit his campaign stance on the
boondoggle known as NATO. That relic is
a complete and total waste of money.
NATO is a destabilizing force in the world and there is no place for it
in today’s world, especially for peace-loving nations. From Lew Rockwell.com:
Excerpt:
No Need For Nato
A NATO summit approaches that
brings Donald Trump to Europe and then on to these shores, and brings the usual clamour for more of the
taxpayers’ money to be given to arms manufacturers.
Yet NATO is a demonstrably useless
institution. It’s largest ever active
military deployment, for 12 years in Afghanistan, resulted in military defeat
throughout 80% of the country, the installation of a pocket regime whose
scrip does not run further than you can throw the scrip, and a vast outflow of
heroin to finance the criminal underworld throughout NATO countries…
In invading Afghanistan and boosting the heroin warlords, NATO
countries destabilised themselves.
NATO’s second biggest military
operation ever was the attack on Libya,
where NATO carried out an incredible 14,200 bombing sorties using high
explosive munitions and devastated Libya’s infrastructure and entire cities.
Here is Sirte after NATO “liberation”.
The direct result of the
devastation of Libya and destruction of its government infrastructure has been the massive untrammeled exodus of migrants,
especially from West Africa, through Libya and across the Mediterranean on
boats. This has not only led to the appalling exploitation and tragic death of
many migrants, it has fundamentally weakened the governments and indeed
governing public ethos of European NATO member states and led to a right wing
populist surge throughout much of the EU.
In short, in destroying Libya, NATO
members destabilised themselves. Now
NATO is focusing once more on the original “threat” it was supposed to combat,
a Russian invasion of Western Europe. Russia has absolutely no intention of
invading Western Europe. The very notion is ludicrous. It does not require
NATO to deter a threat that does not exist…
Russia does have disproportionate
military power for its size – but not that much. Russia’s defence spending is
one sixth that of NATO defence spending, though it is slightly more efficient
because, despite corruption, less of
Russia’s defence spending goes into the pockets of arms company shareholders,
lobbyists, politicians and other fatcats than happens in the West. But that
cannot outweigh Russia’s massive economic disadvantage. Nothing can. Russia is
very well placed to defend itself, but in no position to attack major powers.
Russia’s foreign policy successes – in Crimea, Syria and Georgia – have
been based not on massive military strength – the NATO powers far outweigh
Russia there – but simply on much better
statecraft. And NATO, for all the trillions western taxpayers spend on it,
has been unable to do anything about it…
In fact if anybody has not worked
out by now that our famed nuclear arsenal is a chocolate teapot, then they have
not been paying attention. In none of the recent foreign policy crises –
including the North Korean nuclearisation issue – nobody, anywhere, ever has mentioned Trident missiles as part of the
solution. They are utterly worthless.
The threat of a Russian attack on
NATO itself is non-existent. The EU is not officially a military alliance but
the idea that any part of EU territory could be subject to invasion without the
rest of the EU reacting is a political impossibility... So
NATO’s role of defence against Russia is otiose, and its wider military
adventures have been a total disaster…
Ahh, yes the neocon war mongers are going crazy. They will do anything to derail Trump’s Peace
Train stop in Helsinki to meet with Vladimir Putin. The closer the meeting gets the more unhinged
the neocon controlled media gets. They
are completely coming off the rails.
From Tyler Durden:
Excerpt:
Neocons Panic as Trump-Putin Meeting Could Mark Close of Syrian Proxy
War
They're raging, warning an pleading
-- it all looks very desperate
When multiple op-ed pieces appear
in the pages of the New York Times, Washington Post, and the CFR-owned Foreign
Affairs authored by neocons simultaneously pleading with Trump Don't Get Out of
Syria(!) all within the same week, this is
typically an indicator that the president is about to do something good.
Trump is set to meet with Putin
one-on-one this coming Monday in Helsinki after a contentious NATO summit and a
sufficiently awkward visit with Theresa May, and mainstream pundits' heads are exploding.
The Post's Josh Rogin warns, Trump
and Putin may be about to make a terrible deal on Syria, and Susan Rice
suddenly emerges from obscurity and irrelevance to say in the Times that Trump
Must Not Capitulate to Putin while urging
the administration not to "prematurely withdraw United States forces [from
Syria], thus thus ceding total victory to Russia, Mr. Assad and Iran."
From North Korea to Afghanistan to Syria to Ukraine, Rice advises the typical
regime change script of "harsh additional sanctions" anywhere the
dictates of Washington are not strictly adhered to.
Similarly, Eli Lake links together the main regime change wars begun under Obama
while lamenting their potential winding down as a result of Putin and Trump
meeting as indicative of living in "some alternate universe".
"The price of Russian cooperation in Syria cannot be U.S. capitulation on
Crimea," Lake writes, and further calls such a possibility "the most dangerous possible
outcome."
The Kagan-led neocon think tank
ISW, meanwhile, is outraged(!) the
administration appears to lack "the will to use" America's
military might to counter Assad, Iran, and Russia, saying "the
United States should invest now in building leverage for future decisive
action."
And then there's Senator Lindsey
Graham's meltdown on Twitter this week in reaction to both the Syrian Army
victoriously raising the national flag over Daraa and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu telling President
Vladimir Putin during a summit that Israel has no problem with Assad staying, so
long as Israel can preserve "freedom of action" if attacked.
In a significant change of posture
toward Damascus, Netanyahu told reporters in Moscow, “We haven't had a problem
with the Assad regime, for 40 years not
a single bullet was fired on the Golan Heights.”
In the past months there's been
widespread reporting on a
"secret" deal brokered between Russia, Israel, and Syria, which
reportedly involves the Syrian Army agreeing to keep Iranian forces away from
the ongoing successful campaign along the Israeli and Jordanian borders,
especially the contested Golan Heights.
Netanyahu now says, fresh off his
Moscow visit, that Putin agreed to
restrain Iran in Syria, but that ultimately Assad will take back all of Syria. The
New York Times reports this hugely significant acknowledgement and surprising
change of tune from the Israeli PM:
Israel, he said, did not object to President Bashar al-Assad’s
regaining control over all of Syria, a vital Russian objective, and Russia
had pushed Iranian and allied Shiite forces “tens of kilometers” away from the
Israeli border…
The neocon pundits' last hope for military intervention in Syria has
remained Netanyahu, and to see him fold must feel like a swift unexpected
punch in the stomach, but more crucially the Syrian diplomatic cards have
fallen in place just days before
Monday's Trump-Putin meeting.
President Assad has long vowed to
liberate "every inch" of sovereign Syrian territory, something which
but two years ago appeared impossible, yet which now looks increasingly
inevitable. Should the Trump-Putin summit result in a green light that ensures
Moscow and Damascus remain in the driver's seat and set the terms for Syria's
stabilization, we could be witnessing
the final diplomatic chapter in this dark seven-year long proxy war.
However, Trump continues to be urged from various corners of the beltway foreign
policy establishment to salvage and preserve what he can of the open-ended US
troop presence in eastern Syria: the US must "preserve its interests
in the conflict, namely... constraining Iranian influence in the country"
as one Foreign Policy essay argues.
For months now, Trump has talked of
US military withdrawal from the country — which the Pentagon in public
statements has put at over some 2000 troops — a proposal which hawks within his administration have pushed back
against every time.
And then there's the clearly
observable pattern that seems to repeat whenever the administration announces
it is poised to pull out of Syria. Indeed it seems to occur every time the
Syrian Army is on a trajectory of overwhelming victory: an ill-timed and strategically nonsensical mass chemical attack on
civilians supposedly ordered by Assad — inevitably giving the West an open
door for military intervention, new rounds of crippling sanctions, and yet more
international media condemnation heaped on Damascus…
Should Trump and Putin ultimately
come to a lasting settlement on the Syria issue which results in US troop
withdrawal from Syria, will the international proxy war come to a close? Or will
we witness yet another last minute "mass casualty event" or other
other provocation that pulls the US, Israel, and Russia into yet deeper direct
military confrontation?
Hopefully Trump will not be bamboozled by this political
circus and will keep the Peace Train on the tracks. America has nothing to lose and everything to
gain by boarding the Trump Peace Train. From Russia Insider:
Excerpt:
All Aboard the Trump Peace Train! He's Taking the Fight to the War
Party
He wants out of Korea, Germany,
Syria – and NATO!
"You have to be blind not to
see that Trump wants to radically reduce
the US presence overseas – and you’re part of the problem if you find that
worrisome" Justin Raimondo
There’s never a dull moment with
the Trump administration, which means: never
a moment of rest for the War Party. Trump keeps throwing fast balls at the
pundits and assembled “experts,” and they keep striking out, bigtime, as the
ball whizzes past their heads and lands, with a thwack!, in the catcher’s mitt.
“Steee-rike
one!”
First it was the meet up with
Korean leader Kim Jong-un. The media and their attendant policy wonks weren’t
ready for Singapore, where the President gave Kim a glimpse of what his country
could achieve if it would only come in from the cold and allow the warm embrace
of the international community. And while
the North Koreans have repeatedly pledged to give up their nukes, that’s not
good enough for the universally negative “experts,” some of whom
aren’t experts at all but merely former bloggers with history degrees.
Now they’re citing fake news from
NBC claiming that no less than eight anonymous
“US officials” have stated that the North Koreans are covertly
building up their nukes at a super-duper top secret site and it’s all a commie
trick to – do what? Provoke an attack from an easily provoked Trump? Start
World War III? Commit mass suicide?
The icing on the cake is that the
author of this nonsense is none other than Ken Dilanian, the former national
security reporter for the Los Angeles Times, who was fired for having a “collaborative relationship” with the CIA. Yes,
that got him fired from the Times, but it’s a qualification rather than a negative
as far as NBC is concerned.
“Steee-rike
two!”
If the Singapore summit hit them in
an unexpected place – who knew that,
months after the exchange of bloodcurdling threats between Trump and Kim,
they’d be shaking hands and making peace? – then the Helsinki summit with
Putin is the knockout punch. And the howls of pain arising from our hateful
warmongering media, the Democratic party politicians they’re in thrall to, and the phony “human rights” scamsters,
are getting louder by the minute. We
should all revel in their misery.
Trump
campaigned on making peace with Russia: he has a mandate to do so. That,
however, matters little to the “intelligence community” and their media
camarilla, which is up in arms at the very prospect of a Russo-American
partnership for peace. The national
security bureaucracy and the laptop bombardiers who inhabit Think-tank World
have a vested interest in maintaining a cold war status quo that should’ve
ended when the Berlin Wall fell. They are horrified by Trump’s “America First”
foreign policy views, and they are out to stop him by any means necessary – because his victory meant the end of their
worldview and their careers.
Our “allies” are in a panic because the free ride is over – that’s why
the German Marshall Fund is utilizing their extensive propaganda assets to
mobilize elite opinion against the President. This is the kind of foreign “meddling” that’s okay with our media,
and, apparently, fine with law enforcement…
Which is why I was thrilled to see
that Trump is raising the issue of the
35,000 American troops in Germany: what, he wants to know, are they doing
there? And how much is it costing us? The Washington Post sullenly reports:
“The Pentagon is analyzing the cost and impact of a large-scale
withdrawal or transfer of American troops stationed in Germany, amid
growing tensions between President Trump and German Chancellor Angela Merkel,
according to people familiar with the work.
“The effort follows Trump’s
expression of interest in removing the troops, made during a meeting earlier
this year with White House and military aides, U.S. officials said. Trump was said to have been taken aback by
the size of the US presence, which includes about 35,000 active-duty troops,
and complained that other countries were not contributing fairly to joint
security or paying enough to NATO.
“Word of the assessment has
alarmed European officials, who are scrambling …”
Oh yes, they’re scrambling, the poor dears: not just our gormless
“allies,” but also their amen corner in Washington, which is going into an
outright meltdown –- and what a glorious sight it is!
“Steee-rike
three!”
Finally an American president has woken up to the fact that World War II, not
to mention the cold war, is over: there’s no need for US troops to occupy
Germany. Vladimir Putin isn’t going to
march into Berlin in a reenactment of the Red Army taking the Fuehrer-bunker –
but even if he were so inclined, why won’t Germany defend itself?
So let’s take inventory of our
President’s recent pronouncements:
He wants US troops out of Germany. He wants US troops out of Korea, or else he
wants Seoul to start paying the bill. He wants US troops out of Syria – and
this is bound to come up during the Helsinki summit.
He wants out of NATO, telling our “allies” at the recent G-7 summit
that “NATO is as bad as NAFTA. It’s much too costly for the US…”
I don’t care about his other views,
quite frankly. They are irrelevant. Because if and when he implements his
“isolationist” policies, the size, scope, and expense of government will
radically shrink. That’s because the rationale for big government will be
very much weaker: the political class won’t have the “national security” angle
to justify universal surveillance and huge taxpayer outlays to foreign
ingrates.
If he manages to lift the burden of empire from the weary
shoulders of the American people, the federal government will get smaller
despite the intent of the Trump administration or its successors: the process
will be as near to automatic as any human activity can possibly be.
You have to be blind not to see
that Trump wants to radically reduce the US presence overseas – and you’re part
of the problem if you find that worrisome. It’s time to get on the Trump peace train –
because it’s riding into history whether you like it or not.
All aboard! The Trump
Peace Train is scheduled to roll into Helsinki on Monday and let’s hope peace
prevails. The Neocon Terrorists that
seized control of America in 2000 will be just a bad memory. Drain the neocon swamp, Mr. President. Gain steam and roll on down the tracks. Make way for the Trump Peace Train. God speed, Mr. President.
By Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment