Friday, March 4, 2016

The Revolutionaries: Can Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump and Alan Grayson Save Syria?



The American Empire is in its death throes and the mortally wounded beast is at a dangerous point of no return in Syria.  Syria, with its strategic location, was the crown jewel for the Project for a New American Century’s hegemony that would ensure the annihilation of Iran and ultimately Russia.   



In 2013, Secretary of State John Kerry went to congress and the American people and declared Syrian President Bashar Assad had gassed his own people.  Americans were told, we must bomb Syria and remove President Assad from power.  One brave revolutionary stood up against to the American juggernaut, Congressman Alan Grayson of Florida. 




Excerpt:


Rep. Alan Grayson: Syria Intelligence Manipulated
Anti-war Democrat says he can't discuss specifics.


Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., who is aggressively lobbying against a military strike on Syria, says the Obama administration has manipulated intelligence to push its case for U.S. involvement in the country's two-year civil war….


He says members of Congress are being given intelligence briefings without any evidence to support administration claims that Syrian leader Bashar Assad ordered the use of chemical weapons…


The White House released its four-page public report Aug. 30, arguing that Assad's government killed 1,429 people on Aug. 21 with a planned chemical weapon attack…


Grayson, however, says "the claim has been made that that information was completely mischaracterized…"


He points to an article published by The Daily Caller that alleges the communications actually showed Syrian officers were surprised by the alleged chemical weapon attack…


"What they say in The Daily Caller is that [intercepted communications] would lead one to the opposite conclusion," Grayson said. "I don't know if it's right or wrong, [but] there's a very simple way to find out, that's for the administration to show me and other members of Congress" translated transcripts of the intercepts, he said….


Lawmakers are unable to discuss among themselves classified intelligence about Syria unless they are inside an approved reading room beneath the U.S. Capitol Visitor Center and questioning the official account of events, he said, is "actively discouraged…"


"The administration wants to flood the zone by excluding other information or points of view," he alleged. "I think that it is interesting that the administration consistently refers to Assad doing this and Assad doing that and Assad doing the other thing without giving the public any evidence to support the proposition that Assad has done anything…"


Opponents of military action cite intelligence failures before the Iraq War and the fact that many Syrian rebels are al-Qaida-associated religious fanatics who also commit atrocities.


A defeat in Congress would embarrass Obama, who stated his intention to strike Syria before caving to pressure and announcing he would seek congressional approval.


"We can't go to war to spare anyone embarrassment," Grayson told U.S. News. "That would be utterly immoral, we're talking about shedding American blood. ... The president has already made that argument and it's falling on deaf ears."


Yes, that was in 2013 when Revolutionary Congressman Alan Grayson was able to persuade congress to deny the Obama Administration a war authorization against Syria.  And, guess what?  Grayson was right. 


Thank God, Alan Grayson was able to stop the Obama Administration from making a grave “mistake” of going to war against Syrian President Bashar Assad based on false and manipulated intelligence.  From Mint Press:


Excerpt:


Hersh Vindicated? Turkish Whistleblowers Corroborate Story On False Flag Sarin Attack In Syria


Two deputies from the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) have claimed that the government is against investigating Turkey’s role in sending toxic sarin gas which was used in an attack on civilians in Syria in 2013 and in which over 1,300 Syrians were killed…


It supports Seymour Hersh’s reporting that the notorious sarin gas attack at Ghouta was a false flag orchestrated by Turkish intelligence in order to cross President Obama’s chemical weapons “red line” and draw the United States into the Syria war to topple Assad.


Oh my God!  Poor President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry, they were duped by Turkish intelligence.  So much for Obama’s superior judgement.


“Wiretapped phone conversations reveal the process of procuring the gas at specific addresses as well as the process of procuring the rockets that would fire the capsules containing the toxic gas…


Over 1,300 people were killed in the sarin gas attack in Ghouta and several other neighborhoods near the Syrian capital of Damascus, with the West quickly blaming the regime of Bashar al-Assad and Russia claiming it was a “false flag” operation aimed at making US military intervention in Syria possible.


Suburbs near Damascus were struck by rockets containing the toxic sarin gas in August 2013.


The purpose of the attack was allegedly to provoke a US military operation in Syria which would topple the Assad regime in line with the political agenda of then-Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his government…


CHP deputy Şeker spoke after Erdem, pointing out that the government misled the public on the issue by asserting that sarin was provided by Russia. The purpose was to create the perception that, according to Şeker, “Assad killed his people with sarin and that requires a US military intervention in Syria.”


He also underlined that all of the files and evidence from the investigation show a war crime was committed within the borders of the Turkish Republic.


“The investigation clearly indicates that those people who smuggled the chemicals required to procure sarin faced no difficulties, proving that Turkish intelligence was aware of their activities.


Oh no, our “ally” Turkey deliberately orchestrated a war crime against the Syrian people?  Boy oh boy, I bet the Obama Administration is really grateful toward Congressman Alan Grayson for his superior judgement in not being duped by Turkish intelligence.  And Congressman Grayson is running for the Senate seat vacated by Presidential candidate Marco Rubio.


I just bet that Obama and Biden are so grateful to Grayson that they will back his bid for the Florida Senate seat.  What’s that you say?  From The Hill:




Excerpt:


Obama, Biden endorse Murphy in Florida Dem Senate primary


President Obama and Vice President Biden are throwing their considerable weight into Florida’s contentious Democratic Senate primary, endorsing Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-Fla.), his campaign announced Wednesday.


Obama and Biden’s involvement amounts to a full-court press by the Democratic Party establishment on behalf of Murphy, who is running against liberal firebrand Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.)


Boy talk about poor judgement.  It appears that Obama and Biden weren’t duped by Turkish intelligence after all.  Looks like they wanted to go to war in Syria and are angry at Congressman Alan Grayson for being an obstacle on the neocon race to war course.


“I am proud to endorse Congressman Patrick Murphy for the United States Senate,” Obama said. “Floridians can count on Patrick Murphy to stand up for them every day as their next senator.”


Biden is set to campaign with Murphy in the Sunshine State on March 28…


It comes one day after a Public Policy Polling survey showed Grayson leading Murphy 32 percent to 22 percent, though 45 percent of likely Democratic primary voters say they are undecided…


“Murphy's Washington handlers are hitting the panic button," said Greg Blair, a spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee. "This is a candidate who has no credibility with his own party's base and the Democrat establishment is doing everything in its power to prop him up...”


Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) last week called on Grayson to quit the campaign. He cast doubt on Grayson’s progressive bonafides and questioned the Florida congressman’s “moral compass" based on his handling of his hedge fund.


“These deeply troubling allegations should disqualify anyone from a seat in the U.S. Senate,” Reid said in a statement.


Old hapless Harry wants Revolutionary Grayson out of the Senate race and casts doubt Grayson’s “progressive bonafides.”  Obama’s Justice Department is investigating Congressman Grayson’s hedge fund business.  Funny how anyone that questions the Obama Regime is investigated.  In Hillary Clinton’s case the Justice Department retroactively classified e-mails to create a pseudo crime.


You know what would be delicious?  Hillary Clinton endorsing Grayson, even if Grayson is a Bernie Sanders backer.  If Hillary were to back Grayson it would give her a credibility with Bernie supporters.  After all Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi were two of the super delegates who overturned the will of the voters in 2008 Democratic primary when Hillary won the popular vote. 


One thing is for sure, Senator Alan Grayson would more than likely back up President Donald Trump’s call for building a sanctuary safe zone in Syria for Syrians displaced by war.  President Trump would make the Gulf States pay for the rebuilding of Syria.  From Breitbart:



Excerpt:


Monday night at a rally in Knoxville, TN, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said instead of bringing refugees to the United States he would build a “big, beautiful safe zone” in Syria.


Trump said, “What I like is build a safe zone in Syria. Build a big, beautiful safe zone, and you have whatever it is so people can live, and they’ll be happier.”


Her (sic) added, “So You keep ’em in Syria. You build a tremendous safe zone, it’ll cost you tremendously much less, much less, and they’ll be there and the weather’s the same. And the weather is the same and then when this horrible situation that is so horrible run. We don’t know what we are doing. When its all over they move back and they go back into their cities, and they rebuild there (sic) cities. And they start out and they start over again.”


Donald Trump’s Syria stand is in direct contrast to the failed Obama plan, demanding that the elected President Bashar Assad must go before America and the EU will stop bombing the Syrian people.  The people of Syria do not want the neocon’s “moderate” terrorists formerly known as Al Qaeda to take control of their country.  From India.com:


Excerpt:


No peace in Syria till Bashar al-Assad steps down, says Barack Obama


"But history would judge us harshly if we did not do our part in at least trying to end this terrible conflict with diplomacy,” he added.


Hey dumb ass, the history train has already left the station and America will be judged harshly for starting the war in Syria after Assad was reelected.


Washington, Feb 26 : US President Barack Obama once again renewed his call for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step down, saying there is no alternative to his removal.


Obama also called on Russia and the Syrian government to honour a negotiated ceasefire in the war-torn country, warning Moscow and Damascus that the “world will be watching,” a report in Daily Mail said.


Obama made the remarks after holding a rare meeting with his national security team at the State Department on Thursday, a day before the cessation of hostilities was due to come into force.


What the hell is that?  Obama holding a “rare meeting with his national security team at the State Department??”  Who is running this country?  All those neocons Bush packed in at the State Department are signatories to the Project for a New American Century’s New World Order. 


Obama said militants in Syria will never stop fighting until Assad is ousted from power. ”It’s the only way to end the civil war and unite the Syrian people against terrorists,” he claimed.


You are referring to the “militants” trained by the CIA in Turkey and armed by the United States that will never stop fighting until Assad is ousted.  Gawd, I can’t read any more of that crap.  You know, here in America the Presidential election is scheduled to take place in November.


America is being told that Senator Bernie Sanders is starting a Revolution.  Really?  Bernie Sanders is a Revolutionary?  That’s news to me.  From Global Research:


Excerpt:


Despite Anti-War Claims, Sanders Endorses President Obama’s Foreign Policy


Appearing on CBS’ ‘Face the Nation,’ Sanders praised Obama’s expansive military policy while condemning Clinton for her support of foreign wars.


Yep, that’s the Bernie Sanders I know.  He’s a bigger hawk than Hillary ever was.  So let’s hear what the Revolutionary Bernie Sanders has to say about America’s war crimes.


Sunday, Bernie Sanders endorsed President Barack Obama’s violent, expansive foreign policy in an effort to distance himself from accusations of inexperience in matters of war.


At the beginning of an interview on CBS’ “Face The Nation” between John Dickerson and the Vermont senator, Dickerson noted:


“Senator, while you were in New York, North Koreans launched a long range missile. As President, you’d face that kind of thing all the time, very often. And what Secretary Clinton is saying is that you don’t have the experience to be ready for those kinds of challenges on day one.”


Sanders responded:


“Well, that’s what she said about Barack Obama in 2008, and it turned out not to be true. I am impressed by the quality of his foreign policy.”


Sanders also emphasized his vote against the Iraq War, which he said was “most important foreign policy issue in modern history…”


Sanders has also been clear that he supports Obama’s use of drones, despite the weapons’ track record of killing mostly civilians.


While he claims to be against income inequality and wasteful spending, the U.S. spends $3.1 billion annually on aid to Israel, despite the occupation of Palestine, and Sen. Sanders has supported this deadly conflict with his votes.


In another echo of Obama’s foreign policy, Sanders made it clear during the interview that he won’t seek to end the wars in the Middle East, but rather would shift more of the burden of fighting them to foreign forces…


 “If it sounds like another term of Obama’s foreign policy, at least rhetorically, that’s because it is. Minus the inclusions of fair trade … it is nearly identical to the principles espoused by President Obama.”


Blah, blah, blah.  Ok Saint Bernard, you are such a fraud.  Bernie’s followers believe that he is such a Revolutionary.  His judgement is so superior because he voted against giving George W. Bush the leverage to use the threat of war in Iraq to get Saddam Hussein to allow inspectors in.  That is what Hillary Clinton, the junior Senator from New York voted affirmatively on. 


So let’s hear what a real Revolutionary, Vladimir Putin had to say at the meeting of the United Nations.  From Russia Times:


Excerpt:


Do you realize what you have done? - Putin gives the war party a bootin’


Western policy in Syria and Ukraine has failed. Monday's events at the UN, suggest a change of tack. A new, more stable, international order could take hold.


You almost felt sorry for Petro Poroshenko. The end for Ukraine as a major international cause célèbre was as ignominious as it was swift. As wretched as the violence on the streets of Kiev as Euromaidan began to tear Ukraine apart.


First, the President’s delegation at the United Nations General Assembly exited as Vladimir Putin began his speech. Then, at the rear of the room a handful of Ukrainian activists held a tattered national flag.




What an embarrassment.  America’s delegation of neocon chicken hawks abandoned the room like rats jumping off a sinking ship.


Nobody seemed to pay them the slightest attention. One man picked his nose. So did a woman nearby. Other delegates fixed their gaze on the real action below. Eventually, two officials arrived and ejected the group.


No matter how Kiev tries to spin the incident, it was a humiliation. Pitiful in the extreme. Barack Obama had earlier attempted to gently draw a line under the miserable Ukrainian situation which has dogged East-West relations for almost two years now. Poroshenko’s sad stooped walk betrayed the fact that he knew it. The attempts to rage against the dying of the light only made the spectacle more lousy.


America’s policy in Ukraine has failed. Its attempt to land “the big prize” and push NATO to Russia’s underbelly has been in vain…


This summer, the result of America’s meddling in the Arab world came to Europe. A refugee crisis of the kind not seen since 1945…  A new iron curtain has descended over Europe….


Syria, which was once seen as a geopolitical game, has become an existential crisis for the EU…


He also pointed out that Libya was destroyed thanks to the manipulation of the UN Security Council by NATO. “Do you realize now what you have done?”  Putin asked….


A Russian domestic TV panelist had suggested that Obama’s earlier speech “was like being lectured: about how to live, how the US is better than everyone else...”


More-or-less blaming Washington for the rise of ISIS, Putin insisted that “only President Assad's forces are truly fighting terrorism and extremism in Syria.”


That my friends is a Revolutionary.  The world needs a revolution, America has been hijacked and the neocons have permeated every branch of government in the United States.  The two parties and Supreme Court are bought and paid for by Zionists engorged with America’s wealth.  The world needs a Revolution and help is on the way.


The Revolution is being led by Alan Grayson, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.  Viva la revolución.


By Patricia Baeten



Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Sweet Revenge: Hillary and the Donald Dismantling the Juggernaut


Oh how sweet it is.  The sweet, sweet taste of revenge is so, so good.  The ticking time bomb created by the confluence of the politicians, Supreme Court, media monopoly and banking cartels is ready to blow.  Hillary and the Donald have beat them at their own game and the juggernaut is dismantling.


The howling and guttural growling coming from the beast as it is being exorcised from the body politic is reaching ear shattering decibels.  The carefully cultivated electoral process where the candidates are selected before the first ballot is cast is over.  The New World Order is over, done, kaput. 


I wrote in my blog post in August last year of how the Democrat establishment’s super delegates had overruled the voters in the 2008 primary and chose Barack Obama as the Democrats’ candidate for President.  


Once installed in office, Obama and his self-proclaimed Zionist Veep Biden put the Project for a New American Century’s New World Order on steroids.  For the next eight years the governments in Ukraine, Greece, Burkina Faso, Egypt and on and on were overthrown, bankrupted and natural resources sold off.



Now the neocons are panic stricken begging the voters to flock to Marco Rubio, begging Democrats to skip the Democratic primary and vote for Marco Rubio in the Republican primary.  The stench of desperation is emanating from every source imaginable.  From Peter Beinart at The Atlantic:



Excerpt:


Why Liberals Should Vote for Marco Rubio


Democrats must do everything they can to prevent Donald Trump’s nomination—like supporting the one man with a chance to beat him..


Ha, ha.  Fat chance Peter, you have no idea how many Democrats support Trump, but go on, make your case.  This should be good:


Marco Rubio would be a terrible president. His tax proposals make George W. Bush look fiscally prudent. He acts as if America can use sanctions, war, or the threat of war to bludgeon its adversaries into submission despite the devastating failure of that approach since 9/11. He has been dishonest and gutless on immigration. He has flirted with climate-change denial even though his hometown now regularly floods.


Still, if I lived in any of the nine Super Tuesday states that allow non-Republicans to vote in their GOP presidential primary, I would cross over—forfeiting my chance to cast a ballot for Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders—and vote for Rubio….


Just imagine what might happen if were Trump nominated or, God forbid, elected. In myriad ways, America would become an uglier, scarier place.


If Rubio won, by contrast, the Republican Party might be stabilized. The terms of debate between the two parties would remain roughly the same. Given how radical even “establishment” Republicans like Rubio actually are, that’s a depressing prospect.


Nominating Trump would upend all that. American politics would fundamentally change. But as conservatives have often reminded liberals, change does not equal progress. Sometimes even a morally corrupt status quo is better than what follows. A Trump nomination would represent a leap into a terrifying political unknown.
  

Gee, that’s so persuasive all that sweet talk about Marco Rubio.  What a dumb ass.  So whom else wants to sweet talk to voters to back Rubio even if he is a tool for Vulture Capitalist Paul Singer?  Why it’s none other than Vulture Capitalist Larry Summers.  From The Chicago Tribune:



Excerpt:


Commentary: Donald Trump is a threat to American democracy


The possible election of Donald Trump as president is the greatest present threat to the prosperity and security of the United States. I have had a strong point of view on each of the last 10 presidential elections, but never before have I feared that what I regarded as the wrong outcome would in the long sweep of history risk grave damage to the American project.


Now that’s rich, the architect of the greatest global economic disaster in the history of the world is afraid that President Trump is a threat to the prosperity and security that he and his Zionist buddy Joe Biden helped create.  Larry you’re an even bigger dumb ass than Peter Beinart. 


So let’s take a little jaunt over to the Libertarian side and see it they can convince us to dump Trump for the bankers’ choice Marco Rubio.  So what’s Ilia Somin at the Volokh Conspiracy have to say?


Excerpt:


Time to unite against Trump


Donald Trump’s victories in New Hampshire, South Carolina, and now Nevada should be a wakeup call to all who oppose him. The time has come for us to unite – and to prioritize Trump’s defeat over other electoral considerations.


If you are a conservative or libertarian who cares about upholding the Constitution and limiting the power of government, your main goal in this GOP nomination campaign must be to stop Trump. 

  
I am not going to go over all the reasons why Trump would be a horrible nominee in detail. That has been done already by others, such as Peter Wehner, and the participants in the National Review symposium on Trump…


At least in the short term, we cannot eliminate the ignorance and xenophobic bigotry that drives much of Trump’s support. But we can work to ensure that all those who oppose Trump within the GOP unite under the same flag…


Who should be the one? It’s pretty obvious that Ben Carson’s campaign is hopeless, at this point. John Kasich is an admirable candidate in a number of ways. But it’s also clear that he has very little if any chance of winning….


Ted Cruz has better odds than Kasich, and even managed to beat Trump in Iowa. I am far from being a big Cruz fan myself. Still, I can understand why many conservatives – and even a few of my libertarian friends – support him. But, whether you like him or not, he has only a small chance of success….


That leaves Marco Rubio as the best choice. Rubio is acceptable to a wide range of conservative and moderate Republicans, and to both the Tea Party wing and the establishment…


There is a plausible argument that Cruz would have a better chance in a one on one race with Trump than Rubio would.


Oh Ilya, you know I love you but no matter how many times you and your pals at VC close your eyes and click your heels together repeating “Cruz is natural born American” he is not.  An American woman’s uterus is not an American territory. 


The logic that anyone born anywhere in the world, as long as your mother was an American you automatically are a natural born citizen of the USA is bogus. 


David Drucker from the Washington Examiner was on C-Span this morning making the same bullshit case that Ted Cruz is a natural born citizen.  Some on the right are comparing Donald Trump to Hitler, but truth be told it is Ted Cruz is more comparable to Hitler.  From Joseph Farah at WND:


Excerpt:


HITLER WAS INELIGIBLE FOR PRESIDENCY, TOO


Exclusive: Joseph Farah shows how Germans of 1932 also dumbed down their constitution


The American political and media elite have determined, for whatever reason, that the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the presidency are not important….


It’s not unprecedented that failing republics dumb down eligibility requirements for the presidency. It’s not unprecedented that failing republics ignore or obscure eligibility requirements for the presidency. It’s not unprecedented that failing republics make tragic mistakes in permitting non-qualified candidates to serve in the presidency.


It happened in 1932 in Germany with a candidate named Adolf Hitler.


In fact, this tragedy, which resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of innocents and the utter destruction of the German republic, is documented in the biography of Dietrich Bonhoeffer by Eric Metaxas.



Of course when Mr. Farah wrote that piece in 2011 he was referring to Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President.  Funny that many on the right that felt that way about the constitutional requirement of being a “natural born citizen” now have amnesia. 


The neoliberals and neoconservatives fear Trump the most, especially Rupert Murdoch and his media empire.  From Newsmax:


Excerpt:


Trump: I'll 'Open Up' Libel Laws if Elected


Republican U.S. presidential front-runner Donald Trump said on Friday that if elected he would "open up" libel laws to make suing the media easier.


Speaking at a rally in Fort Worth, Texas, Trump said the change was necessary to combat what he described as the "dishonesty" of major American newspapers.


Trump routinely criticizes the press during campaign appearances, complaining about coverage he says is unfair and at times singling out people or news outlets for special insults. He often invites audiences at his rallies to boo the journalists gathered in a special fenced-off part of the room. At a Dec. 23 appearance in Grand Rapids, Michigan, he joked about killing journalists as the crowd thundered applause.


"One of the things I'm going to do if I win," he said on Friday, "I'm going to open up our libel law so when they write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money."


If you really think about it, what Trump is saying is that he will get rid of Citizens United, the worst Supreme Court decision in our nation’s history.  From Reclaim Democracy:



Excerpt:


What is Citizens United? | An Introduction


…Citizens United, the PAC, was founded in 1988 by Floyd Brown, a longtime Washington political consultant, with major funding from the Koch brothers (industrialists who own “the second largest privately owned company in the United States”).


It gained fame in 2009 for suing the Federal Election Commission, leading to a controversial Supreme Court case (now also commonly known as Citizens United) eliminating some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections…


In the 2008 election season, Citizens United the PAC sought to broadcast TV ads for a video-on-demand film criticizing presidential candidate Hilary Rodham Clinton, but doing so would violate the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (known also as the McCain–Feingold Act), which barred corporations and unions from paying for media that mentioned any candidate in periods immediately preceding elections…


In a 5-4 ruling, the Justices declared unconstitutional the government restriction on “independent” political spending by corporations and unions, and determined the anti-Clinton broadcast should have been allowed. The decision overturned century-old precedent allowing the government to regulate such spending….


One of the main instruments of this influence is the legal concept of “corporate personhood,” wherein corporations receive the same Constitutional protections as individuals. Corporations use these protections to claim the “right” to lie to the public, for example, or to influence elections in various ways.


Corporations have lobbied for and received these protections for decades, despite our country’s founders intending no such thing. The Citizens United decision is just the latest in a long line of decisions granting Constitutional rights to corporations.


Yes, Citizens United was launched to allow personal attacks and lies against Hillary Clinton during a campaign.  Joe Biden and his Republican wing of the Democratic Party had big plans for this campaign season. 


The plan was to continually leak lies to a compliant press about Hillary to weaken her and then have Biden and the super delegates step in and declare her unelectable. Everything was moving right along according to plan until Donald J. Trump announced his candidacy and wham. 


There’s a real dilemma here, if they knock Hillary out of the competition that leaves Trump. If they knock Trump out that leaves Hillary.  What to do, oh what to do.


The Oh how sweet it is.  The sweet, sweet taste of revenge is so, so good.  The ticking time bomb created by the confluence of the politicians, Supreme Court, media monopoly and banking cartels is ready to blow.  Hillary and the Donald have beat them at their own game and the juggernaut is dismantling.


Sweet revenge, sweet revenge will prevail without fail.



By Patricia Baeten


Tuesday, February 23, 2016

NATO, Turkey and Saudi Arabia’s Worst Nightmare President Donald Trump




Donald Trump’s decisive win in South Carolina has launched his meteoric vault toward the White House.  In his speech after he was declared the winner of the primary election he took on the military industrial complex with a fervor not seen since President Dwight Eisenhower. 


The beneficiaries of Bush and Obama’s Evil American Empire invading and destroying nations throughout the world have been Turkey and Saudi Arabia.  Along with their NATO allies, America has spent trillions of dollars on the military industrial complex while our roads and bridges fail and jobs have been shipped to third world countries.



The unparalleled destruction of Syria as well as all of the Middle East, Eurasia and Africa will come to an end under President Donald Trump and the world is taking note.  From The Atlantic:


Excerpt:


SPARTANBURG, S.C.—Donald Trump pulled off a big win in South Carolina Saturday night, pulling in about a third of the vote and far outpacing any of his rivals…


Trump ticked off the key elements of his platform—the border wall, a stronger military, winning at trade, and defeating ISIS….   And while he said he’d get the military the equipment it needed, he also promised to kill costly pork projects whose only constituency was in Congress. (While he didn’t use the phrase, it was an unusually direct hit on the military-industrial complex.)



It has been over 15 years since the 9-11 attacks that destroyed the World Trade Center, which allowed the administration of George W. Bush to enact the Project for a New American Century’s New World Order.  


The 9-11 Commission identified Saudi Arabia as the funding source for the attacks, but those 28 pages of the Commission’s report have been sealed by both the Bush and Obama Administrations.  From LaRouchepac:


Excerpt:


On June 2, 2015, at a press conference in Washington, D.C., Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), flanked by former Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL), Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Thomas Massie (R-KY), and representatives of the 9/11 families, announced that he had introduced S.1471, a bill to declassify the 28 pages from the original Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11. The Senate bill is co-sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY). H.Res.14, a House bill introduced in January by Jones, Lynch, and Massie, called for the release of the 28 pages….


All of the speakers—the Senators, Congressmen, and family representatives—singled out Saudi Arabia as the well-spring of the 9/11 attacks and subsequent jihadist terrorism. They all demanded that President Obama fulfill his promise, made on at least two occasions to the 9/11 families, that he would make the full 28 pages public….


Pressure is building in both Houses of Congress. The Obama Administration's current 'strategy' in the Middle East, and the terrorism deployed from that region, has created a global tinderbox, ready to ignite at any moment.


First in Libya, then in Syria, Obama's support for so-called "moderate rebels," has effectively blown up in the United States' face. Finally, in the summer of 2014, the terrorizing advance of ISIS across Iraq and parts of Syria made it official: the "War on Terror," launched in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S., and our foreign policy since, has been a failure.



Indeed, the so called “War on Terror” has turned into an American led “War of Terror” with America subservient to Saudi Arabia and Turkey and the results have been disastrous.  From Mint Press:


Excerpt:


Turkey Demands Unconditional US Support In Fighting Syrian Kurds


Over the weekend, Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu demanded that the US pledge “unconditional” military support for Turkey in the fight against the Kurdish YPG, a Syrian faction which has been the primary US ally in fighting ISIS.


“The only thing we expect from our US ally is to support Turkey with no ifs or buts,” Davutoglu insisted, reiterating the claim that the YPG was behind last week’s Ankara bombing, despite a Turkish faction, the TAK, claiming it.


Can you imagine Turkey telling President Trump “The only thing we expect from our US ally is to support Turkey with no ifs or buts?”


Turkey has repeatedly demanded the US sever ties with the YPG, and the US has repeatedly rejected those demands. Turkish officials appear to be hoping that the Ankara bombings, and the dubious claims of YPG involvement, will force the US into shifting their policy.


With the US and Turkey both already condemning the Syrian military for its gains against ISIS however, the shift against the YPG would be tantamount to backing ISIS’ territorial claims in northern Syria, and leave the US with literally no allies in the region.


Man, do you believe that crap?  US neocons and Turkey are condemning Syria for protecting their own country.  God, can this shit get any worse, I guess so.  From Sputnik News:


Excerpt:


'One Must Be Blind Not to Realize That Russia is Defending Europe in Syria'


The threat to European interests in the Middle East comes not from Russia, but from Turkey and Saudi Arabia, says French Middle East expert Roland Lombardi. Ankara in particular has a great deal to lose, and in its desperation might try to pull NATO into a reckless military campaign against Russia, the analyst warns….


Lombardi bluntly asked. "One must be either blind or a complete idiot not to notice that, when Russia defends its interests in the Middle East, it is simultaneously defending the interests of Europe, and particularly those of France," the analyst bitingly added….


"Let's not deceive ourselves," the analyst says. "Today, the only threats to the world order are our 'allies' – the Turks and the Saudis; the same people whose double game with some terrorist and jihadist groups has appeared out in the open; the same people who still want to install the Salafists or the Muslim Brotherhood in Damascus and in all the Arab capitals affected by the Arab Spring."


Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's dream of becoming the neo-sultan of a neo-Ottoman empire has been fading before his eyes, Lombardi warns. Facing growing international isolation, Ankara is supported in its Syria policy only by Saudi Arabia. And  here, more and more frustrated, the world is in danger of a Turkey attempting to involve NATO in a war against Russia.



Yep, that’s right.  The only allies the American government has in the war against Syria are Saudi Arabia and Turkey, who have laid a trap for the stupid America in Syria.  America is taking down the entire world along with it.  From GlobalResearch:


Excerpt:


The Syrian Endgame, “A Lost War is Dangerous”. US-NATO, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, “Losers on The Rampage”


How a war is lost is a serious and dangerous business. After Henry Kissinger helped sabotage the 1968 Paris peace talks, for domestic political reasons, the War in Vietnam raged for another seven years. In the end Washington’s loss was more humiliating, and millions more lives were destroyed.


The Geneva process over Syria is in many respects different, because it is a charade. The NATO and Gulf monarchy sponsors pretend to support Syrian ‘opposition’ groups and pretend to fight the same extremist groups they created.


Yet the dangers are very real because the Saudis and Turkey might react unpredictably, faced with the failure of their five year project to carve up Syria. Both countries have threatened to invade Syria, to defend their ‘assets’ from inevitable defeat from the powerful alliance Syria has forged with Russia, Iran, Iraq and the better party of Lebanon.


It should be clear by now that every single anti-government armed group in Syria has been created by Washington and its allies. Several senior US officials have admitted the fact. Regime change has always been the goal. Nevertheless, the charade of a ‘War on ISIS’ goes on, with a compliant western media unwilling to point out that ‘the emperor has no clothes’….


Would Washington allow Erdogan and the Saudis to initiate a major escalation, without US approval? I think not. Obama resisted Saudi and Israeli provocations, when the Iran deal was imminent. Even Bush could not be provoked into a confrontation with Russia, when invited by Georgia’s Mikheil Saakashvili.


For its part, Russia is well prepared for a provocation across the Turkish border. Logic suggests that the losers must lose. But this is a dangerous time.


I think maybe the question isn’t would Washington allow Erdogan and the Saudis to initiate a major escalation, but can Washington control the Frankenstein’s monster they created in Syria.  From Mint Press:

Excerpt:


US-Backed Rebels Fight One Another In Northern Syria


American armed and trained Syrian rebels are losing ground to American armed and trained Kurdish militants in northern Syria.


The recent Syrian military offensive in Aleppo Province has the US keen to throw even more aid at rebel factions, including some Islamist-leaning groups….


This was done with an eye toward them fighting the Syrian military, and maybe ISIS, but instead they’re locked in a growing battle with the Kurdish YPG, itself the recipient of massive amounts of US weaponry, meaning once again two US-armed factions are in open war in Syria….


US efforts to arm rebel factions initially focused on the Free Syrian Army, but as the group became increasingly irrelevant on the ground, the US began courting other rebel factions they thought were more capable of fighting ISIS, but as they added to the number of factions they were arming in this increasingly complex war, it was inevitable they’d be on both sides of some fights.



Are you wondering where the Pentagon is getting all this money they’re throwing to terrorists to overthrow elected governments like Assad’s in Syria?  From U.S. News:


Excerpt:


Inside the Pentagon’s ‘Slush Fund’


Obama’s inability to eliminate the “OCO” budget leaves war planners awash with unregulated money.


It’s been called war planners’ crack cocaine, a shifty accounting scheme or a habit-forming opiate imbibed government-wide. Barack Obama pledged to eliminate it at the beginning of his presidency, but its potency has only grown stronger since. Now, it accounts for the unregulated spending of $60 billion or more in taxpayer dollars per year, with no end in sight….


Get used to the Overseas Contingency Operations budget.


The OCO was known from 2001 to 2009 as “the supplemental” and is now considered a de facto slush fund. It began as the war budget President George W. Bush needed for the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan without having to go back to Congress…


But another benefit for war planners is that the Pentagon does not have to release details publicly on how specifically this money will be spent….


…this year the proposed budget actually grew by $200 million despite thousands fewer combat troops in Afghanistan and, technically, none in Iraq.


The appropriators put stuff in there that serves their interests. And they move money around like Three-Card Monty.


“Now everybody’s corrupt with regard to OCO.”


The Pentagon's Overseas Slush Fund Is Getting Even Slushier


The president this year released an OCO budget of $58.8 billion, in addition to the $582.7 billion base budget, up from the contingency fund’s $58.6 billion budget last year and a base budget of $580.3 billion.


With $8.5 trillion missing at the Pentagon these neocons like self-proclaimed Zionist, Joe Biden and his cronies at the State Department like Victoria Nuland are gearing up to end the world before we can elect a new President.  From Paul Craig Roberts:


Excerpt:


The Neoconservatives Are Brewing A Wider War In Syria


The neoconservative Obama regime set-up the Syrian government headed by Assad for overthrow. A long propaganda campaign conducted in Washington’s behalf by the Western media portrayed the democratically-elected Assad as a “brutal dictator who uses chemical weapons against his own people….”


With the “red line” drawn, a false flag chemical weapons attack was staged, or an accident occurred, that Washington used to say that Assad, despite the US warning, had crossed the “red line.”


Preparations for an invasion began, but hit two roadblocks. David Cameron, Washington’s puppet prime minister of Great Britain was unable to deliver British support for the invasion as the Parliament voted it down. This left Washington uncovered and vulnerable to the charge of naked aggression, a war crime.


Russian diplomacy threw up the other road block by securing the removal of all chemical weapons from Syria.


Their invasion plan frustrated, the neoconservatives sent the jihadists they had used to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya to overthrow Assad….


In order to protect themselves, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah have come to the support of Syria.  The Russians are there legally at the invitation of the Syrian government. The US is there illegally. 


Russian air power in support of the Syrian Army has turned the tide against the Islamist State.


The invaders are being driven out. The neoconservatives cannot accept this defeat.


Washington is preparing a Syrian invasion by Turkey and Saudi Arabia, the purpose of which is to split Syria in half with Washington controlling the eastern part with the oil fields…


So Trump’s victory in South Carolina, after dispelling the myth that George W. Bush kept America safe after the 911 attacks, is a harbinger of things to come in this election season.  Trump, like Eisenhower before him understands that America cannot be great again unless the military industrial complex is reigned in.  From Reason:


Excerpt:


Donald Trump Denounces Wasteful Pentagon Spending, Vows Great Defense W/No Additional Spending


At an appearance in New Hampshire, Trump went into full Tea Party Beast Mode, attacking virtually every aspect of government spending, including what President Eisenhower famously vilified as the "military-industrial complex":


On defense, in a race in which all of his Republican rivals favor increasing military spending, Trump promised instead to go after waste and profiteering in the defense industry. "I hear stories, like they're ordering missiles they don't want because of politics, because of special interests," Trump said. "Because the company that makes the missiles is a contributor…"


Trump has at times espoused the idea of letting Russia and other countries "fight ISIS in Syria," with the United States only coming in later once things have calmed down….


There are whole weapons and aircraft systems that are needlessly expensive…  consider the F-35 fighter jet, which exemplifies everything that is wrong…


The jet, which will be obsolete by the time it is actually up and running properly (which may never actually happen), has a price tag of at least $1.5 trillion and will likely need to use really old planes to support it on missions. None of this has stopped the Pentagon from going ahead and ordering 404 of the occasionally airborne boondoggles over the next few years….


Trump railed against pharmaceutical companies. He railed against oil companies. And insurance companies. And defense contractors. And he set himself against a political system that he said allows big-money corporate "bloodsuckers" to control the government with campaign contributions.


"Whether it's the insurance companies, or the drug companies, or the oil companies, it's all the same thing," Trump said. "We're never going to get our country back if we keep doing this."...


So the beneficiaries of Bush and Obama’s Evil American Empire are NATO, Turkey and Saudi Arabia and with every winner there are many losers.  The biggest loser is America, our public schools have been replaced with Charter Islamic Madrassas run with taxpayer money by Turkish terrorist Fethullah Gülen. 


Gülen has funded trips to Turkey for congressional members, who then rewarded Gülen with H1B visas to bring teachers from Turkey to teach in his charter schools in America. 


Other losers are our members of the military who are sent to fight in Turkey and Saudi Arabia’s wars in the Middle East.  When our brave, selfless warriors return they are discarded like garbage by our government and have their benefits slashed through sequestration. 


Our States and Puerto Rico have been bankrupted, our water poisoned, our homes foreclosed on, our medical delivery system turned over to Wall Street and our prisons privatized.  Banks no longer serve our communities and overtly provide money laundering services for terrorists.    


We have seen the return of debtors’ prisons and local police departments are funded by innocent citizens’ property seizures.   The list goes on and on.  But Donald J. Trump doesn’t need the funding of the military industrial complex to become President.  The American people have become servants to the politicians who claim to serve the American people.


President Donald J. Trump is NATO, Saudi Arabia and Turkey’s worst nightmare.  However Trump will destroy the Masters of War in our government and thus America’s 16 year nightmare will finally be over.



By Patricia Baeten

Be kind, share.