Did Joe Biden use his office to leak damaging lies about
Hillary Clinton’s e-mails to derail her Presidential campaign? Did Joe Biden tell Susan Rice to go on
television and lie to the American people about Benghazi? Did Joe Biden use the office of the Vice
President to overthrow the government in Ukraine? Did Joe Biden use his ties with Rupert
Murdoch to disseminate misinformation about Hillary Clinton to advance his own
interests to become President?
Joe Biden has used his dead family members to advance his
career for decades and now he is using his dead son Beau to launch his
presidential bid. From Time:
Excerpt:
Beau Biden’s Dying Wish Was for His Dad to Run for President, Report
Says
Vice
President Joe Biden’s late son Beau told his father to run for president before
he died, according to a report.
New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, in her weekend column
entitled “Joe Biden in 2016: What Would Beau Do?,” describes, in great detail, a conversation that Beau had with his
father before dying, urging his father to run for president rather than
letting the office fall to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Joseph
“Beau” Biden III died of brain cancer at the end of May. Dowd’s source for the
anecdote is not clear from the column…
A Presidential bid he’s launching due to Hillary’s faltering
campaign after numerous leaks from his office questioning her “credibility,
trustworthiness and lack of truthfulness.”
Did Joe Biden have a hand in retroactively classifying information in
Hillary’s e-mails? Is Joe Biden behind
these Hillary Clinton polls that no other candidate seems to have conducted
about them? From The Atlantic:
Excerpt:
As Joe Biden edges closer to a
presidential run, there’s no shortage of theories as to what he’s up to. Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton
has built a commanding lead in the national polls, giving Biden little apparent
space to gain traction. Perhaps he’s counting on the early-primary state of
South Carolina to provide a critical boost.
He might be banking on appearing as
a stronger general-election candidate than any of his potential rivals in the
primary race. Maybe after spending the past 42 years of his life running for
elective office, he just can’t stop.
But there’s one intriguing theory that has so far garnered little
attention: What if Biden knows something about Democratic frontrunner Hillary
Clinton that the rest of us don’t?...
Clinton, meanwhile, is battling a steady drip of negative headlines
and revelations stemming from her use of a private email address and server
during her term as secretary of state. Investigators
have found that some emails contained information that was later classified, and media
reports have suggested that some of this information may have been considered classified at
the time it was shared, even if it hadn’t yet been labeled that way.
The emails that Clinton gave to the
State Department are now being released in tranches every 30 days….. No one
knows what the emails that have not yet been released may contain.
No one, that is, outside of the
administration…. And the State Department has assigned a team
to sort through the emails, reviewing
them for classified information…
Biden forged many relationships during his long tenure in the Senate,
and State is chock full of longtime friends and former aides. The current deputy secretary of state,
to choose the most prominent example, is Antony
Blinken. He was hired as the staff
director of the Senate’s foreign relations committee in 2002, and senior
adviser to its senior Democratic member: Joe Biden.
He stuck with Biden through the 2008 campaign, first becoming his
national security adviser in the White House, then moving over to become
Obama’s deputy national security adviser in 2013, and finally taking up his
current role at the State Department in 2015.
There’s no reason to think that
Blinken, or any of Biden’s other contacts within the White House or the
national-security establishment, have shared with the vice president any
information to which they’re privy.
Yes, according to The Atlantic “There’s no reason to think
that Blinken, or any of Biden’s other contacts within the White House or the
national-security establishment, have shared with the vice president any
information to which they’re privy.”
Why aren’t the
American people polled to see if they are aware that Joe Biden, on camera said “not
all Jews are Zionists, not all Zionists are Jews, I am a Zionist.” Why aren’t the American voters polled and
asked if they want a Zionist for president?
Why aren’t the American people polled and asked whether they
voted to overthrow the Government in Ukraine and instigate a civil war?
Excerpt:
Ukraine, the country now taken over by a coup d état of Israeli and
the U.S. and ruled by brutal Jewish
oligarchs, is set to receive billions of dollars in arms for its military from
the Obama Administration. But the Ukrainians had to prove their loyalty to
the Jews and to Zionism to get these armaments.
First, Ukraine’s corrupt new governors agreed to make U.S. Vice
President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, a board member of Burisma, Ukraine’s
largest gas company. Hunter Biden will
also be the chief legal officer of Burisma.
“This is totally based on merit,”
said Burisma’s chairman, the Jew, Al Apker.
Uh huh.
Another American, Devon Archer, was
also promoted to the board. Who is Archer? Well
Devon Archer and Hunter Biden are business cronies. Together with U.S.
Secretary of State John Kerry’s stepson, Chris Heinz, they own a mysterious
private equity firm called “Rosemart Seneca Partners.”
Two months before February’s coup d état, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden
traveled to Ukraine. He met with the chief Rabbi and other top Jews and
made arrangements with Burisma, aligning that gas enterprise with the American
oil and gas industries. This means that Rockefeller and Rothschild and their
energy pals are “in,” and Russia and Putin are “out.”
Of course, when Biden and Kerry’s sons go into Ukraine, where they
don’t even know the language, and “assume supervision” of Burisma, you know
that the fix is in….
American arms are pouring in, and NATO troops are in-country.
Israel is training pro-Zionist Ukrainian Jews to do the dirty work of killing
and destruction and sending them into the Ukraine.
At the U.S. State Department, Vicki Nuland, the powerful Jew who
heads the Ukrainian desk, is dictating to the Ukraine which of the Jewish
oligarchs are favored by the Jewish American and Israeli big-wigs. And, sleazy men like Hunter Biden, Devon
Archer, and their U.S. sidekick, Chris Heinz, are raking in the big bucks as
directors for a crooked Ukrainian energy firm. War really is a racket.
Raking in big bucks indeed, war is very lucrative, just ask
Vicki Nuland, wife of neocon Robert Kagan and the whole PNAC (Project for a New
American Century) crowd. From Consortium News:
Excerpt:
A Family Business of Perpetual War
Exclusive: Victoria Nuland and
Robert Kagan have a great mom-and-pop business going. From the State
Department, she generates wars and – from op-ed pages – he demands Congress buy
more weapons. There’s a pay-off, too, as grateful military contractors kick in
money to think tanks where other Kagans work, writes Robert Parry.
Neoconservative pundit Robert Kagan
and his wife, Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, run a remarkable
family business: she has sparked a hot
war in Ukraine and helped launch Cold War II with Russia – and he steps in
to demand that Congress jack up military spending so America can meet these new
security threats.
This extraordinary husband-and-wife
duo makes quite a one-two punch for the Military-Industrial Complex, an inside-outside team that creates the
need for more military spending, applies political pressure to ensure
higher appropriations, and watches as thankful weapons manufacturers lavish
grants on like-minded hawkish Washington think tanks.
Patty cake, patty cake banker’s man, Joe Biden is the choice
to protect the Wall Street Banks. Joe
Biden is sold as the everyman, just a regular Joe. That is, if everyman, regular Joe is a serial
killer. When serial killers are caught
neighbors say, he just seemed like a nice guy, no one you’d ever think would
kill innocent people. Joe has been a
reliable banker’s man and so have his sons.
That’s why Wall Street banks laundered three quarters of a
billion dollars into the Obama Biden Campaign in prepaid, untraceable $200 or
less credit card donations. Good old Joe
Biden has been a real money maker for Wall Street banks his entire career. And what did Wall Street get for their money
from Joe Biden? For one thing, a for
profit prison system. From MSN.com:
Excerpt:
WASHINGTON — When Joseph R. Biden
Jr. became the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1987, a few months
ahead of his first and ultimately unsuccessful presidential campaign, he told
aides his goal was to enact legislation that would take a comprehensive
approach to reducing crime.
As the ranking minority member of the
committee since 1981, Mr. Biden had
helped pass two bills establishing mandatory minimums for drug offenses. But
as chairman, facing high violent crime rates, a crack cocaine epidemic, and
accusations by Republicans that his party was soft on crime, Mr. Biden wanted
holistic reform.
The effort, which defined much of his time as committee chairman,
culminated in the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, a sweeping, bipartisan bill that touched
nearly every aspect of American law enforcement that was signed into law by
President Bill Clinton.
Yes, Joe Biden’s role in privatizing prisons for profit in
1987 as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee was a great big caaching for
Wall Street Banks. And how did that work
out for the American people, particularly black Americans? From the Sentencing Project:
Excerpt:
Private sector
involvement in prisons is not new — federal and state governments have had a
long history of contracting out specific services to private firms, including
medical services, food preparation, vocational training, and inmate
transportation.
The 1980s, though, ushered in a new era of prison privatization. With a burgeoning prison population
resulting from the “war on drugs” and increased
use of incarceration, prison overcrowding and rising costs became
increasingly problematic for local, state, and federal governments.
In response to this expanding
criminal justice system, private
business interests saw an opportunity for expansion, and consequently,
private-sector involvement in prisons moved from the simple contracting of services
to contracting for the complete
management and operation of entire prisons.
Today, the
privatization of prisons refers both to the takeover of existing public
facilities by private operators and to the building and operation of new and
additional prisons by for-profit prison
companies…
And that is just one of the lucrative deals Wall Street’s bag man Joe
Biden delivered. Then there was old
black-hearted Zionist Joe Biden’s one two punch to students and their families. First punch was the total privatization of
Sallie Mae, the government backed student loan program and the second punch the
Bankruptcy Protection for Predatory Lenders Bill.
Excerpted from Salon
The federal
government’s efforts to help students pay for college have resulted in the
accumulation of a trillion dollars of student loan debt and a constant
political struggle over the proper role of the public and private sector. Sallie Mae — created by the government
but now fully private — is at the heart of the struggle; a deep-pocketed
corporation with powerful political connections and its fingers stuck deeply in
every part of the student lending pie.
The class action
suit claimed that in 2006-2007, as it
prepared itself for a lucrative purchase by a consortium of banks and private
equity investors, Sallie Mae lowered its lending standards to bolster its
portfolio of high-interest-earning “subprime” private student loans. But,
when the economy started to crash and default rates spiked, Sallie Mae
attempted to hide the damage by changing its loan forbearance policy to punt
defaults into the future. In the proposed settlement, the two parties agreed to
the creation of a $35 million pool to “resolve investor claims.”
That may be good news for the investors and sounds like a
relatively cheap price for Sallie Mae to pay to avoid a trial. But the settlement offers nothing to the
targets of Sallie Mae’s reckless attempt to pump up its profits: the students
who were lured into taking out the loans to pay for their education. Private
sector loans typically come with much higher interest rates than
government-backed loans. It’s a toxic
mix almost guaranteed to increase economic hardship: low-income students,
high-interest loans and stratospheric default rates.
“While the shareholders look like they’re going to make out well,
the real victims of Sallie Mae’s apparent scheme — the low-income and
working-class students who should have never been steered to take out these
high-cost, risky subprime private loans in the first place — will not get even
a penny of relief from this settlement agreement,” said Steven Burd, a
specialist in higher education at the New America Foundation. “Sallie Mae will essentially get off
scot-free, while many of these borrowers will be stuck with this debt hanging
over them for the rest of their lives….”
As it completed its journey to full privatization, Sallie Mae
rapidly became the dominant force in student lending, with net profit approaching $2 billion a year, and a total portfolio of
student debt near $100 billion — which in 2005, represented 45 percent of
all federally backed student loans. From
1999-2004, Sallie Mae’s top two executives, Al Lord and Tom Fitzpatrick,
received compensation worth $225 million and $245 million, respectively.
So from the time Sallie Mae was fully privatized, the tax payers paid
their top two executives $225 million and $245 million respectively. Good old Joe Biden, looks like Wall Street
Banks and Credit Card Companies got a real bargain with Joe Biden.
So Zionist Joe is thinking of throwing his hat in the ring due to
Hillary Clinton’s vulnerability caused by constant leaks about her e-mails on
her personal server. Much like the
Watergate Scandal where President Richard Nixon used the power of his office to
sabotage the Presidential candidacy of George McGovern, looks like ethically
challenged, Joe the Wall Street bagman is using the power of his office to
sabotage the Presidential candidacy of Hillary Clinton.
It’s quite a scandal, the State Department, under John Kerry has
assigned a team to sort through Hillary’s emails and slowly releases them in tranches. Damaging lies are fed to Zionist Rupert
Murdoch who floods the airwaves with misinformation about Hillary Clinton. Then Murdoch conducts polls showing Hillary
Clinton is vulnerable due to all the leaks about her e-mails and clears the way
for Joe Biden.
They even have enlisted Bob Woodward, the Republican Watergate era
reporter who along with Carl Bernstein broke the Watergate story. From National Memo:
Excerpt:
Clinton Emails: Is This Watergate? Or Just Another Whitewater?
Hillary Hysteria is raging everywhere, from
the most disreputable websites to the most respected newspapers. Candidate
Clinton’s polling numbers are down. Her email server is in the custody of the
FBI. Her comments brushing aside the controversy have only infuriated the
Washington press corps, which has virtually declared war on her.
But why is the political press so
agitated? Is this Watergate, a shattering scandal with profound implications
for national security and the Constitution? Or is it Whitewater, a meaningless
squib of a failed real estate investment, absurdly inflated by the national media
and partisan adversaries?
According to many journalists –
along with the Republican Party and its favorite propagandists – the email
uproar surrounding Clinton equals the worst political scandal in modern
American history. On Fox News, eminent analyst Meghan McCain thrilled credulous
viewers by telling them the Clinton emails “could be this generation’s
Watergate.” On MSNBC, Bob Woodward of The Washington Post, excited his Morning
Joe hosts with a similar comparison that echoed across the media.
“Follow the trail here,” intoned Woodward, who broke the Watergate
story four decades ago with Carl Bernstein. “You’ve got a massive amount of
data. It, in a way, reminds me of the Nixon tapes: thousands of hours of
secretly recorded conversations that Nixon thought were exclusively his,” he
said, adding: “Hillary Clinton initially took that position: ‘I’m not turning
this over, there’s gonna be no cooperation.’ Now they’re cooperating.”
But like so much of the commentary
about Clinton’s emails, that last remark by Woodward was entirely inaccurate —
as he should know.
When the State Department first requested emails for its archives from
all living former secretaries of state, Clinton was the only one to provide any
files at all; both Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell said they no longer
possessed the emails they had sent on private servers. And when the FBI
asked to examine Clinton’s server to determine whether her emails contained any
information that was or ought to have been classified, her attorneys turned it
over immediately.
Yes, all the hysteria over Hillary’s e-mails that John Kerry’s
and Joe Biden’s State Department requested were turned over to them, unlike
Colin Powel and Condoleezza Rice’s e-mails that potentially would show real
criminal culpability for the lies fed to a terrified nation that led to the $2
trillion dollar war in Iraq.
Woodward swiftly amended his
hyperbolic outburst, saying that his Nixon comparison referred to “the volume
of emails” measured against the White House tapes, rather than any attack on
the character of the Democratic frontrunner.
Perhaps Woodward suddenly
remembered what actually occurred during
Watergate – a series of gangster
conspiracies based in the Nixon White House that included burglaries,
warrantless wiretaps, illegal spying, campaign dirty tricks, election
tampering, money laundering, and assorted thuggish schemes, growing into a
cover-up that compounded those initial felonies with still more crimes
committed by lawyers and bureaucrats who collected corporate bribes and then
handed out hush money to the perpetrators.
But don’t forget what the e-mails are really about. Susan Rice went on national TV and lied to
the American people about the attacks that took place in Benghazi, Libya on the
anniversary of the 9-11 attacks in 2012 to protect Barack Obama who was in the
middle of his presidential campaign.
The real questions is not, did Hillary send or receive
classified e-mails on her private server, but who told Susan Rice, UN
Ambassador to go on TV and lie. From Nick Gillespie at Reason .Com:
Thank Sid Blumenthal for Telling Hillary Clinton Benghazi Was a Planned
Attack
What did she know and when did she
know it? More important: WTF were we doing in Libya to begin with?
The worst thing about the endless
investigations into the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in
Benghazi, Libya—an attack that killed four Americans, including Amb. Chris
Stevens—is that they obscure the larger picture: WTF were we doing in Libya in the first place?
President Obama involved us in a war situation (called a
"kinetic action" back then, if memory serves) not just without congressional approval but without any sort of
consultation. For the entire 21st century, under both Reps and Dems,
American foreign policy has been an #EPICFAIL, but current Republicans keep
focusing in on small-ball questions about what did Hillary or Obama or Susan
Rice know and when did she/he/she know it….
[Blumenthal's] memo said the
attacks were by "demonstrators" who "were inspired by what many
devout Libyan viewed as a sacrilegious internet video on the prophet Mohammed
originating in America." Mrs. Clinton forwarded the memo to Mr. Sullivan,
saying "More info." (Pages 193-195)...
The next day, Mr. Blumenthal sent Mrs.
Clinton a more thorough account of what had occurred. Citing "sensitive
sources" in Libya, the memo provided extensive detail about the episode,
saying that the siege had been set off by members of Ansar al-Shariah, the
Libyan terrorist group.
Those militants had ties to Al
Qaeda, had planned the attacks for a month and had used a nearby protest as
cover for the siege, the memo said. "We should get this around asap"
Mrs. Clinton said in an email to Mr. Sullivan. "Will do," he
responded.
That information contradicted the
Obama administration's narrative at the time about what had spawned the attacks. Republicans have said the administration
misled the country about the attacks because it did not want to undermine the
notion that President Obama, who was up for re-election, was winning the war on
terrorism. (Pages 200-203).
Score one for Sid Vicious. This
exchange suggests that Clinton knew by September 13 that the attacks were not a
spontaneous demonstration. Other accounts show that "within 15
minutes" of the attack "that it was terrorism."
National Security Advisor Susan
Rice would hit five major talk shows on Sunday, September 16 (Clinton was not
available, we were told) and gave variations on the theme that "it was a
spontaneous—not a premeditated—response."
So is the whole Hillary Clinton e-mail hysteria really Joe
Biden’s Watergate? Are government
agencies being used to undermine a Clinton Presidency in order to continue the devastating
foreign policy of the PNAC crowd? Did Zionist Joe Biden tell Susan Rice to lie to
America about Benghazi to ensure the reelection of Barack Obama just like Nixon
used government agencies to reelect Richard Nixon?
That is the real question.
Is Joe Biden part of the secret society John Kennedy warned us about?
By Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment