President Barack Obama gave his last State of the Union
address and if the truth be told the real state of America is she’s come
undone. Glen Ford at Black Agenda Report
described the State of the Union speech as such:
Excerpt:
Swan Song for a War and Austerity President (Who is Also Black)
“Obama reserves for the U.S. the
right to kill as many foreigners as it sees fit, and still claim to be
technically at peace.”
It was like Reagan with a case of
diversity. Instead of “Morning in America,” Barack Obama summed up his
presidency as an arduous climb out of the Bush abyss, a return to sanity that
is now threatened by the gathering darkness of Trumpist barbarity.
Obama’s fictional – and,
thankfully, final – State of the Union address seems coherent only when
juxtaposed with Republican counter-fictions. Together, the two interlocking
narratives describe a nation and world of complete fantasy.
For the ruling class installed by Wall Street banks, life
couldn’t get better. They are ready to
install the next generation of privileged few to make the laws that they
themselves need not abide by.
The primary election and the debates where the corporate
media decides who will get a slot in the debates and who is not worthy of prime
time is like a WWF wrestling match, all hype and fakery. Nothing more than a reality show that seems
surreal. One thing is certain, the two
parties hate Donald Trump and they hate Hillary Clinton and will do everything possible
to ensure their defeat.
Obama doubled down on the policies of George W. Bush and
took a bad situation and made it worse.
There is no difference between the Bush/Cheney regime and the
Obama/Biden regime, they are one and the same.
So let’s look at the great “accomplishments” achieved by Obama/Biden
that the next Wall Street approved Administration will build on.
Under his guidance, “we recovered
from the worst economic crisis in generations” (by further consolidating the
hegemony of the banks, pumping tens of trillions into the accounts of the Lords
of Capital, and finally admitting that Wall Street was too big to jail);
In the 2008 primary campaign, Obama refused public financing
which opened the door for Wall Street banks to funnel three-quarters of a
billion dollars into his campaign, $300 million in pre-paid, untraceable $200
or less credit cards during the month of October 2008 alone. And what did the banks get from Obama and
Biden? From International BusinessTimes:
Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Gets
Pay Raise After Raking Up $25 Billion In Legal Fees
|
Excerpt:
US Treasury Got $117B From The Fed In 2015; $19.3B To Fund Federal
Highway Bill
The U.S. Federal Reserve sent a
record $117 billion to the Treasury in 2015, it announced Monday, surpassing
the record $96.9 billion in 2014….
The Fed had a net profit of $100.2 billion in 2015….
Most of the income was derived from interest on securities acquired
from the open market. The Fed holds a big portfolio of assets such as Treasury
bonds, as well as mortgage and debt instruments. Since the financial crisis, remittances to the Treasury have grown
significantly from $31.7 billion in 2008…
With the economy recovering, an
increase in interest rates is expected and when that happens, the Fed will have
to pay out more money to other banks that deposit money with it. The central bank will also eventually
reduce its investment, which has grown to about $4.5 trillion from $900 billion
in 2008.
My, my, my. Let me
see if I have this right, the Federal Reserve Bank had a net profit of $100.2
billion in 2015 which was income derived from interest on Treasury bonds, then
they lent the U.S. Treasury $117 billion of those profits they received from
those bonds to fund things like the Highway bill. Man, you can’t make that shit up. So what else did Obama/Biden chalk up as
accomplishments? Back to Glen Ford’s
piece in BAR:
“reformed our health care system”
(through his 2009 bait-and-switch that further embedded corporate insurers and
drug monopolists and set back true “universal” single payer health care,
possibly for a generation);
And how has the Wall Street profit driven Obamacare worked
out for everyday Americans? From Kate
Randall at World Socialist Web Site:
Excerpt:
Obamacare enrollment deadline: Fines mount for failure to buy costly,
barebones insurance
Tuesday was the last day to choose
a health plan under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for coverage beginning
January 1. Penalties for those who fail
to obtain insurance coverage for 2016 will rise dramatically—more than
sevenfold—compared to the first two years of the ACA.
The “individual mandate” of Obamacare, as the ACA is popularly
known, requires people who are not
insured through their employer or a government program to purchase coverage from private insurance companies on the health
care exchanges set up under the legislation….
The Obama administration is seeking to use the spiking penalties to
browbeat those uninsured… This coercion
for the benefit of the insurance giants is yet another exposure of Obamacare,
which aims to force people to buy
coverage from for-profit insurers under
financial threat.
Meanwhile, people on the insurance
exchanges are finding that the least expensive ACA plans come with massive deductibles, co-pays and other
out-of-pocket costs…
According to the government’s own
projections, ACA enrollees face on average a 7.5 percent premium rate increase
in 2016. Other sources predict rate
hikes in excess of 20 percent….
The Fiscal Times reported last
month that bronze deductibles for 2016 will
average over $5,700, a nearly 10 percent rise. The deductible must be paid in full before any health coverage kicks
in, except for those services deemed “essential” by the ACA…
For a patient suffering from a
debilitating disease, restriction to an HMO likely means he will no longer be
able to visit a specialist, such as an oncologist or rheumatologist, with whom
he has established a relationship over months or years. The impact is potentially life-threatening.
At the same time, Obamacare prepares the way for the
privatization of Social Security and Medicare and their transformation into
voucher programs…
Yes the Obama/Biden Administration are frauds posing as
Democrats but in reality they are Reagan Democrats ready to slash all social
programs to preserve Wall Street bank profits.
During the 2008 primary contest Obama/Biden attacked Hillary for her
healthcare plan. From Fact Check.org:
Excerpt:
One of Clinton’s signature claims
has come under fire from political foes, quoted by the Boston Globe, who say
she doesn’t deserve credit for expanding federal health insurance for millions
of children.
We review the record and conclude
that she deserves plenty of credit, both for the passage of the SCHIP
legislation and for pushing outreach efforts to translate the law into reality…
“Narrator: She fought for universal health care long
before it was popular. Got health insurance for six million kids, and expanded
access to health care to the National Guard. Now she’s the only candidate for
president with a plan to provide health care for every American. A top
economist calls Hillary’s plan the difference between achieving universal
health coverage – and falling far short.”
We had not previously had reason to
question her role in the creation of the State Children’s Health Insurance
Program (SCHIP) during her husband’s administration, but last week the Boston Globe ran a story with the headline,
"Clinton role in health programs disputed."
The Globe said Clinton "had
little to do with crafting the landmark legislation or ushering it through
Congress, according to several lawmakers, staffers, and healthcare
advocates involved in the issue."
This was quickly picked up and amplified in various political blogs
accusing her of exaggeration and even "lying..."
How much you want to bet those lawmakers, staffers and
healthcare advocates were from the Obama/Biden camp?
The pro-Republican Washington Times
newspaper credited (or perhaps more accurately, blamed) Hillary Clinton for the
program in a 1997 article. The paper said it had obtained documents from 1993
showing that the White House "plotted"
to push a "Kids First" insurance program if Mrs. Clinton’s universal
health care proposal failed.
Washington Times, Aug. 6, 1997: The
plan signed into law yesterday by Mr. Clinton and pushed by the first lady is a
duplicate of the 4-year-old health care task force idea, except that it is paid for by a 15-cent tax on cigarettes…
Years later, when Clinton was first running for the Senate,
Kennedy’s aide Littlefield was still giving her credit. The New York Times
quoted him as saying, ”She was a
one-woman army inside the White House to get this done.”
He said that when
President Clinton himself was showing reluctance to back the new legislation
out of fear it would upset a budget deal with Republicans, "We went to Mrs. Clinton and said, ‘You’ve got to get the
president to come around on this thing,’ " and she did…
Moreover, Hillary Clinton took a major role in translating the new law
into action….
Kennedy, of course, is now backing
Clinton’s rival, Barack Obama, for the nomination.
What else does Glen Ford have to say about Obama/Biden and
the State of the Union speech?
In every State of the Union
address, Obama poses as a champion of Social Security and Medicare. But, in January, 2009, before even taking the
oath of office, the president-elect told the editorial boards of the
Washington Post and the New York Times that “all entitlements,” including Social Security would be “on the table” for
chopping during his administration.
He proceeded to seek a $4 trillion “Grand Bargain” with the Republicans, the scope
of which was revealed in a leaked 2011 memo described by author Bob Woodward on
NBC’s Meet the Press:
“...what it shows is a willingness
to cut all kinds of things, like TRICARE, which is the sacred health
insurance program for the military, for military retirees; to cut Social Security; to cut Medicare….
In 2013, Obama took another stab at cutting Social Security, with
an attempt to change the way benefits are calculated. Had he succeeded in his
premeditated assaults, we would have watched him brag, last night, that he had
“saved” the nation’s premier social safety net, trimming it down to affordable
size. Social Security is fortunate to have emerged relatively intact from seven
years of Obama.
Yes, the Obama/Biden legacy is the final chapter that
Republicans have tried for years to achieve, the Reagan Thatcher dream. Joe Biden has always been the banker’s man,
he likes to come across as an everyday “Joe” but it’s Joe Biden you can thank
for enslaving a whole generation to a staggering trillions of dollars in
student loans debt that can never be forgiven, not through bankruptcy nor
death. Biden was chosen for VP by Obama
as a quid pro quo. From The New YorkTimes in 2008:
Excerpt:
Obama Aides Defend Bank’s Pay to Biden Son
During the years that Senator
Joseph R. Biden Jr. was helping the credit card industry win passage of a law
making it harder for consumers to file for bankruptcy protection, his son had a
consulting agreement that lasted five years with one of the largest companies
pushing for the changes, aides to Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign
acknowledged Sunday….
Campaign officials acknowledged
that the connection between the Bidens and MBNA, the enormous financial
services company then based in their home state of Delaware, was one of the
most sensitive issues they examined while vetting the senator for a spot on the
ticket….
The financial services industry
began seeking relief from Congress in the mid-1990s from an increase in
bankruptcies that was cutting into its profits…. During that time, executives at MBNA, which was bought in 2006 by Bank
of America, began donating heavily to
both major political parties and many national politicians, including Mr. Biden…
He was one of five Democrats in March 2005 who voted against a proposal
to require credit card companies to provide more effective warnings to
consumers about the consequences of paying only the minimum amount due each
month…
Mr. Biden also went against Mr. Obama to help defeat amendments aimed at strengthening protections for people
forced into bankruptcy who have large medical debts or are in the military;
In many of these battles, Mr. Biden’s Democratic colleagues often
voiced their frustration with the big financial interests arrayed against them.
Senator Paul Wellstone specifically cited MBNA during a floor debate in March
2001 over his call for stronger protections for debtors forced into bankruptcy
because of medical bills — an amendment that Mr. Biden would later vote against.
“It just so happens that the people who find themselves in terrible
economic circumstances through no fault of their own — major medical bills,
they have lost their jobs, or there has been a divorce — it is my view as a
former political scientist and now a senator for the State of Minnesota that those
people do not have the same kind of clout that MBNA Corporation has,” Mr.
Wellstone said.
Yes that’s old black hearted Joe Biden, voted against any
protections for people in bankruptcy due to illness or military service. This is especially revolting because Joe is a
war hawk, who was instrumental in overthrowing the government in Ukraine. And guess what old Hunter Biden is up to now,
he and John Kerry’s stepson Chris Heinz are have million dollar jobs running Ukraine’s
energy industry. From Boiling Frogs:
Excerpt:
BFP Exclusive-Stench of Corruption a Ukraine Oligarch Shale Gas Civil
War & Baby Biden
Hunter Biden & A Dodgy Company Called Burisma
Ukrainian politics has had the
stench of corruption since the free-for-all to loot the country following the
declaration of independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. However today, some
five months after the gangster-led Washington-orchestrated coup d’etat that put
the present regime illegally in power in Kiev, that stench is becoming
unbearable. Now it involves the case of Ukraine’s deposits of shale gas.
According to a survey done for the
US Department of Energy two years ago, Ukraine could have 42 trillion cubic
feet (tcf) of shale gas resources technically recoverable from 197 tcf of total
shale gas in place….
So some shrewd Ukrainian
businessmen along with the ever-politically engaged Royal Dutch Shell—the
Dutch-UK energy giant, decided they would drill that shale and frack it like
they are doing in Texas today. Here is where it gets really interesting.
The Ukrainian company that has
grabbed (literally) the lease rights to
the lion’s share of Ukraine’s shale area is called Burisma Holdings.
Burisma Holdings is Ukraine’s largest natural gas producer so that in itself is
not that surprising. But wait. It gets smellier.
Burisma Holdings is the company
that raised eyebrows a few months ago when they announced they had hired the
son of the US Vice President to handle their legal division and all
international relations of the company. Hunter Biden was also given a seat on
Burisma’s board of directors….
Joe Biden and son Hunter Biden came
under fire back in 2005 when Joe Biden was an influential Senator before
becoming Vice President. MBNA, then the world’s largest private credit card
issuer hired Baby Biden as the company’s
Vice President.
At the same time Senator Biden was
then receiving his largest campaign contributions from MBNA and, conveniently
for MBNA, was lobbying other Senators to pass bankruptcy reform legislation
supported by MBNA. US media referred critically to Senator Biden at the time as
the "Senator from MBNA."
But it gets far worse in Ukraine.
This April Hunter Biden agreed to join the board of one of the most
politically-charged, scandal-ridden companies in scandal-ridden Ukraine just as
his father, Joe, is up to his eyeballs
in US illegal operations with the State Department’s Victoria Nuland in
orchestrating forced regime change in Ukraine.
The Biden board post at Burisma was
made public at the same time Vice
President father Joe was in Kiev wheeling and dealing with the new
US-installed regime there.
And son Hunter also sits on the
Chairman’s Advisory Board for the National Democratic Institute (NDI). The NDI
is a project of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the taxpayer funded
organization that does what the CIA did covertly 25 years ago, according to one
of its founders, Alan Weinstein.
Burisma Holdings is part of the
vast business empire of Ukraine’s second richest billionaire oligarch, Ihor
Kolomoisky. Joining Hunter Biden on the Burisma Board of Directors is no less
than Aleksander Kwaśniewski, named in January just weeks before the US Kiev
coup.
Kwaśniewski was President of the
Republic of Poland during the G.W. Bush presidency. Chairman of Burisma is a
Wall Street former Merrill Lynch investment banker named Alan Apter. Finally,
Burisma also at the same time named to the board Devon Archer, Hunter Biden’s partner at a US investment firm, Rosemont
Seneca Partners, and a manager of
the family wealth fund of Secretary of State John Kerry’s wife Theresa Heinz
Kerry, widow of Henry Heinz III….
Burisma itself seems very dodgy as a company. It is based in Cyprus
and little information about the business is possible to find. The company lacks a profile in Bloomberg,
and had no Wikipedia presence whatsoever.
So with these two board
appointments in April, Burisma gained
the son of the Vice President of the United States and the financial adviser to
the family of the Secretary of State. Not bad for an almost unknown
Ukraine-Cyprus company
Not bad indeed, seems that Hunter Biden always fails
up. Hopefully Burisma Holdings doesn’t
have a drug screening requirement, as Hunter loves to blow the snow. So what else did Obama/Biden claim as their “great
accomplishments?”
Excerpt:
Obama brags that “we’re in the
middle of the longest streak of private-sector job creation in history.” Yet,
most of them are bad jobs, at low wages and no security – a surge in the
long-term capitalist Race to the Bottom, which will accelerate if Obama
succeeds in passing his grotesque Trans Pacific Partnership corporate trade
treaty.
The outgoing Corporate
Servant-in-Chief admits that “these trends have squeezed workers, even when
they have jobs,” but he prescribes the usual bromide: education. As if what’s
wrong with the economic system is that Americans are ill-educated, rather than
globalized capital’s inability to provide good jobs at decent wages.
It’s the
same garbage that has been shoveled to Black Americans for generations.
According to this logic, Black people must be twice as badly educated as
whites, since African American unemployment has been twice as high for more
than half a century.
So is Glen Ford right about the “Corporate
Servant-in-Chief”? Are the jobs created
under Obama/Biden “low paying, low wage, no security?” Are Obama and Biden escalating a Race to the
Bottom? Oh, oh what’s this? From World Socialist Website:
Excerpt:
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama on Saturday proposed a set of changes to the U.S. unemployment insurance
system that he says would offer more security to out-of-work Americans and
encourage experienced workers to rejoin the workforce, even if it means taking
a pay cut….
The president's proposal would require states to provide wage insurance to workers who
lose their jobs and find new employment
at lower pay. The insurance would
replace half of the lost income, up to $10,000 over two years. It would be
available to workers who were with their prior employer for three years and
make less than $50,000 in their new job…
The proposal comes as U.S. businesses, outside the manufacturing
sector, are experiencing strong demand and adding employees. A recent
government employment report showed that employers added a net 292,000 jobs in
December as the unemployment rate held at 5 percent.
Experienced workers on average see a
pay cut of 10 percent when they lose their jobs. Workers with more than 20
years on the job see an average 25 percent pay cut, according to the White
House.
Obama's proposal will be included in the budget proposal he's set to
send to Congress next month.
So the Obama/Biden prescription at a time when “U.S.
businesses, outside the manufacturing sector, are experiencing strong demand
and adding employees” is to maximize their profits by forcing states to
purchase “employment insurance” to subsidize their low paid workers.
Just another Wall Street banker give away. He’s putting this proposal in his budget he’s
sending to congress where his buddies Paul Ryan and Patti Murray will ram it
through, along with the Trans Pacific Partnership. Yes, the Obama/Biden reign has devastated
America, but the Bidens are doing very well.
So what else did Obama/Biden brag about?
Back to Glen Ford’s article:
Excerpt:
“Obama has become the greatest privatizer of schools in history.”
To improve general educational
levels and, presumably, make Blacks more employable, Obama has become the
greatest privatizer of schools in history, through charters, resulting in unemployment for many tens of
thousands of Black teachers.
In 2014 The Hill published an article calling on the Justice
Department to investigate Obama/Biden’s charter school scam:
Excerpt:
Charter schools, civil rights and the theft of education funds
As one means of fixing what is
broken in our nation's public school system, the Obama administration, as well
as a majority of both Democrats and Republicans in Congress, supports the rapid expansion of publically financed
charter schools.
However, given the startlingly large sums of money some in the charter
school sector are stealing from taxpayers, and the disproportionate impact
the expansion of such practices has on
the civil rights of black, Latino and poor schoolchildren, it may be time
for the judicial branch of government to question the unchecked expansion of this largely unregulated sector of the
educational system. It seems clear that
neither Congress, nor the White House, currently has the political will to do
so.
For example, this past May, two
nonprofit groups issued a research report titled "Charter School
Vulnerabilities to Waste, Fraud And Abuse." Jointly authored by Integrity
in Education and the Center for Popular Democracy, the report warned that the
lax system of federal oversight of the rapidly expanding charter industry has
led to the theft of more than $100
million due to fraud, mismanagement and outright theft…
However, despite such abuses, both the legislative and executive branches of the
federal government, as well as both major political parties, continue to
support the largely unregulated expansion of charter schools.
Just this past April, Congress
voted 360 to 45 to pass the Success and Opportunity through Quality Charter Schools
Act (H.R. 10), which, as stated in the bill, will "strengthen the Charter
School Program and allow successful charter school models to be replicated
nationwide to support choice, innovation, and excellence in education…."
If fraud and theft are not
sufficient reason for the judiciary to become involved, perhaps the possibility
of civil rights abuses will pique their interest….
As a result, the federally
supported policy of aggressive charter school expansion now disproportionately
impacts the educational futures of black, Latino and poor students much more
often than it impacts students who are white.
And did Obama/Biden heed the advice of The Hill in 2014 and
launch an investigation into the fraud, theft and civil rights abuses of the “unregulated”
charter schools? Fast forward to 2015 from
Truth in Media:
Excerpt:
Exclusive: FBI Whistleblower and Teacher Expose Islamic Gülen Movement
Infiltrating U.S. Through Charter Schools
The imam, Fethullah Gülen, came to
the United States in 1999 due to cited health problems and has stayed in the
United States after gaining his visa
with help from former CIA officials. The FBI previously resisted granting
permanent residency status to Gülen. According to leaked cables, parts of the
U.S. government believe that Gülen “is a ‘radical Islamist’ whose moderate
message cloaks a more sinister and radical agenda…”
Gülen-inspired schools are the
largest charter network in the U.S. and receive
approximately $150 million a year in taxpayer money. There are about 130 of
these charter schools in 26 states where the majority of the teachers are from
Turkey, as well as many of the contracts for construction and operation have
gone to Turkish businesses. Those actions have raised red flags for the U.S.
government.
Why Are My Tax Dollars Funding an
Islamic Movement?
In the United States, many of the
Gülen schools have long waiting lists. But
that comes at a price for our American teachers:
“Our tax dollars are paying for
them to come over here and take our jobs,” said Mary Addi, a teacher. “They
want to give you the impression that they’re just hard-working guys over here
to try and educate our kids, because American teachers are just too stupid…”
Gülen brings in foreign teachers
and then takes a cut of their salary. She learned this after marrying a Turkish
teacher. She said that after he was paid. He’d
cash the check and return 40% of his salary back to the school for a secret
fund used by the movement.
These allegations have caused the
U.S. government to investigate for immigration fraud as well as misuse of
taxpayer money. It has also caused many to wonder about the actual intent of
the Gülen school…
We have multiple reliable reports
that the Gülenists use their school network (including dozens of schools in the
U.S.) to cherry-pick students they think
are susceptible to being molded as proselytizers and we have steadily heard
reports about how the schools
indoctrinate boarding students.”
And when Donald Trump says we need to stop all Muslims from
coming into this country until we can find out what the hell is going on he is
vilified. From CNN:
Excerpt:
"Donald J. Trump is calling
for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until
our country's representatives can figure out what is going on," a campaign
press release said….
His message comes in the wake of a
deadly mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, by suspected ISIS
sympathizers and the day after President Barack Obama asked the country not to
"turn against one another" out of fear….
"Where this hatred comes from
and why we will have to determine," Trump said in a statement. "Until
we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat
it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people
that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human
life…"
The release pointed to an online
poll from the controversial Center for Security Policy, which claimed that a
quarter of Muslims living in the U.S. believe violence against Americans is
justified as part of a global jihadist campaign….
Obama's deputy national security
adviser Ben Rhodes reacted to Trump's call Monday on CNN, calling it
"totally contrary to our values as Americans" and pointed to the Bill
of Rights' protection of freedom of religion and pointing to the
"extraordinary contributions" Muslim Americans have made to the U.S…
Yes, the two parties’ condemnation of Trump came fast and
furious. They will do anything to keep
Trump from becoming President of the United States. But their hatred of Trump pales in comparison
to their hate of the Clintons. This is from
a CNN interview with Joe Biden, who despises Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton:
Excerpt:
Washington (CNN) Vice President Joe
Biden offered effusive praise for Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie
Sanders Monday, lauding Hillary Clinton's chief rival for doing a "heck of
a job" on the campaign trail and praising Sanders for offering an
authentic voice on income inequality.
And while Biden said Democrats had
a slate of "great candidates" running for president, he suggested Clinton was a newcomer to
issues like the growing gap between rich and poor….
"It's relatively new for Hillary to talk about that,"
Biden continued, acknowledging that Clinton has "come forward with some
really thoughtful approaches to deal with the issue" of income inequality.
"Hillary's focus has been
other things up to now, and that's been Bernie's -- no one questions Bernie's authenticity on those issues," he said.
So Joe Biden says it’s relatively new for Hillary to talk about
issues like rich and poor and she’s not authentic like Bernie. I guess Joe was busy at a cocktail party at
MBNA when First Lady and President Clinton championed things like the Family
Leave Act. From National Partnership:
Excerpt:
The FMLA was introduced in Congress every year from 1984 to 1993
and was blocked repeatedly by entrenched, well-funded opponents. For years we
built and nurtured a strong, broad-based coalition and led fierce and tireless
advocacy. Congress passed the legislation in 1991 and 1992 — but it was vetoed
both times by President George H.W. Bush.
However, under the leadership of
former president, Judith L. Lichtman, today a senior advisor to the National
Partnership, former legal director counsel, Donna Lenhoff, and current
president, Debra L. Ness, we remained undeterred. And we got the job done — with help from a broad-based coalition,
thousands of activists, and newly-elected President Clinton, who wholeheartedly
supported our vision.
It’s the 2008 Presidential Primary all over again, with
Obama/Biden attacking Hillary every chance they get. When Bill Clinton was President, it was
Hillary who got the Family Leave Act passed, it was Hillary who got Children’s
Health Insurance not only passed but implemented. The establishment hates the Clintons and will
do everything they can to ensure she is not the candidate.
So one thing you can be sure of is that Obama and Biden are
working behind the scenes anonymously claiming Hillary will be indicted,
Hillary is a liar, Hillary has no credibility, and Hillary is unlikeable. Making and repeating these claims will enable
the Super Delegates to override the will of the American voters just like they
did in 2008.
And that is the State of the Union, America, she’s come undone.
By Patricia Baeten
No comments:
Post a Comment